ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
The brighter side of e-waste-a rich secondary source of metal.
Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-Bioleaching of Pyrite Flotation Tailings and Crushed Printed Circuit Boards.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on self-healing photocurable 3D-printed conductive polycaprolactone-based composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Amino-Thiophene Functionalized Metal-Organic Framework on Fabric for Selective Extraction, Recovery, and Passive Sampling of Gold Ions and Nanoparticles.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Bioleaching as a biotechnological tool for metal recovery: from sewage to space mining.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Carbazole-Phosphazene Based Polymer for Efficient Extraction of Gold and Precious Elements from Electronic Waste.ACS omega · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
This article details the electronic waste (e-waste) generation, their composition, health, and environment hazards, and legal rules for disposal as well as their significance as a potential secondary source of metals and other components. Moreover, valuable metal extraction technologies from the e-waste are reviewed in general and waste cell phones in particular. E-waste is nowadays preferentially used for recovery of metals mainly from printed circuit boards (PCBs). Different techniques, namely pyrometallurgy, hydrometallurgy, and biohydrometallurgy used for metal extraction from e-waste are swotted. The economic and environmental valuation features of these technologies are also included. Compared to other methods, biohydrometallurgy is the method of choice, as in it natural components like air and water are used, has low operating and maintenance cost, and operate at ambient temperature and pressure. Microbial aspects of metal extraction from e-waste are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.