Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33438124›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Effects of different types of microbial inoculants on available nitrogen and phosphorus, soil microbial community, and wheat growth in high-P soil.

Yihui Chen, Shuangshuang Li, Na Liu, Huan He, Xiaoyu Cao, Cheng Lv, Ke Zhang, Jiulan Dai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Harnessing NativeApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yihui ChenEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Shuangshuang LiEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Na LiuCollege of Resource and Environment, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, 030801, China.
Huan HeEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Xiaoyu CaoEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Cheng LvEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Ke ZhangEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China.
Jiulan DaiEnvironment Research Institute, Shandong University, Binhai Road 72, Qingdao, 266237, Shandong, China. daijiulan@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9427-9679
Shandong University · CNShanxi Agricultural University · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFD0800303National Natural Science Foundation of China 41977144Shandong Provincial Key Research and Development Program 2018GSF117024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irrational application of chemical fertilizers causes soil nutrient imbalance, reduced microbial diversity, soil diseases, and other soil quality problems and is one of the main sources of non-point pollution. The application of microbial inoculant (MI) can improve the soil environment and crop growth to reduce problems caused by irrational application of chemical fertilizers. Field experiments were carried out in high-phosphorus soils to study the effects of the addition of various MIs combined with chemical fertilizers on soil properties, wheat growth, and soil microbial composition and structure. The MIs consisted of one fungal agent: Trichoderma compound agent (TC) and five bacterial agents, namely soil remediation agent (SR), anti-repeat microbial agent (AM), microbial agent (MA), plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PG), and biological fertilizer agent (BF). The wheat yield increased by 15.2-33.4% with the addition of MIs, and PG with Bacillus subtilis as the core microorganism had the most obvious effect on increasing the production (p < 0.05). For the entire growth period of wheat, all MIs applied significantly increased the available nitrogen (AN) (p < 0.05) but did not significantly affect the available phosphorus (AP). BF has the best effect on increasing AN in the soil. The 16S rRNA sequencing results indicated that the dominant phyla of soil bacteria were Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia. The addition of MIs increased the relative abundance of Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi and decreased Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. The diversity of soil bacterial community (Chao1) was significantly higher in the soil added with TC than that added with BF (p < 0.05). All bacterial agents significantly enriched various genera (p < 0.05), while the fungal agent (TC) did not enrich the genera significantly. pH and AN, but not TP, were closely related to the dominant bacteria phylum in high-P soil. The application of MIs improved AN in soil, increased the wheat yield, and changed the relative abundance of the soil dominant phylum, and these changes were closely related to the type of MIs. The results provide a scientific basis for rational use of different types of MIs in high-P soil.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsMicrobiotaFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil MicrobiologyTriticumFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilBacterial and fungal agentsHigh-P soilMicrobial inoculantSoil bacterial community structureSoil propertiesWheat growth

Identifiers

PMID33438124
OpenAlexW3118941365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.