Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33438078›Full record

ReviewHNO2021

[Integrity of swallowing apparatus-past, present, and future].

A O H Gerstner, W Laffers

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A O H GerstnerHals‑, Nasen-, Ohrenklinik, Klinikum Braunschweig, Holwedestraße16, 38118, Braunschweig, Deutschland. a.gerstner@klinikum-braunschweig.de.
W LaffersKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Carl-von-Ossietzky-Universität, Steinweg 13-17, 26122, Oldenburg, Deutschland. wiebke.laffers@uni-oldenburg.de.
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg · DEKlinikum Braunschweig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSwallowing is one of the most complex movement patterns. The integrity of the epithelial lining is essential.

objectiveWhich surgical techniques were developed at the beginnings of modern surgery and what methods are now available to maintain/reconstitute the integrity of the swallowing apparatus? MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study comprises a selective literature search in early operation manuals and online archives, with incorporation of the authors' own experience.

resultsUp until the 1950s, only very limited techniques were available to reconstruct the epithelial lining. Microvascular reanastomosed grafts were the game changer for reconstructive surgery, enabling reconstitution of the swallowing apparatus in primary surgery but also in challenging secondary interventions after insufficient or complicated primary therapy.

conclusionThe need for anatomical and functional rehabilitation by reconstructive surgery is as pertinent as ever. Particularly in the oncological context, improved early detection and novel local treatment modalities could minimize treatment-associated damage to swallowing.

Indexed as

Deglutition DisordersPlastic Surgery ProceduresDeglutitionHumansAspirationHNSCCMicrovascular reanastomosed transplantsPharyngeal fistulaSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID33438078
OpenAlexW3118397228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.