Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437995›Full record

ArticleHealth education research2021

Testing risk and protective factor assumptions in the Icelandic model of adolescent substance use prevention.

Alfgeir L Kristjansson, Christa L Lilly, Ingibjorg E Thorisdottir, John P Allegrante, Michael J Mann, Jon Sigfusson, Humberto E Soriano, Inga Dora Sigfusdottir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health education research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alfgeir L KristjanssonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
Christa L LillyDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ingibjorg E ThorisdottirIcelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik 101, Iceland.
John P AllegranteIcelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik 101, Iceland.
Michael J MannDepartment of Community and Environmental Health, School of Allied Health Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA.
Jon SigfussonIcelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik 101, Iceland.
Humberto E SorianoDivision of Pediatrics, P. Universidad Católica, Santiago, RM 8330024, Chile.
Inga Dora SigfusdottirIcelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik 101, Iceland.

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Laura F. Gibson · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iceland has witnessed a dramatic decline in adolescent substance use that may be partly the result of efforts related to the Icelandic prevention model (IPM). We sought to test risk and protective factor assumptions of the IPM using a prospective cohort study with 12 months separating baseline from follow-up. Participants were students in grades 8 and 9 in the national Icelandic school system enrolled in the spring of 2018 and 2019 (N=2165). Participants self-reported their experiences of cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and cannabis use and seven risk and protective factors. Analyses were conducted with generalized linear modeling with extension to general estimating equations with correlated outcomes data. Both individual main-effects models and collective models including all main-effects were tested. Out of 28 individual main-effects models, 23 produced findings consistent with study premises (P<0.05). Multiple main-effects models largely sustained the findings of the individual main-effects models. Findings support the assumption that the risk and protective factors commonly emphasized in the IPM are associated with the four different substance use outcomes in the hypothesized direction. Communities that plan to implement the IPM among adolescents might consider these factors in their work.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentHumansIcelandProspective StudiesProtective Factors

Identifiers

PMID33437995
PMCPMC8530171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.