Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437965›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2020

Dual Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition With Sacubitril/Valsartan Attenuates Systolic Dysfunction in Experimental Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

Nabil E Boutagy, Attila Feher, Daniel Pfau, Zhao Liu, Nicole M Guerrera, Lisa A Freeburg, Sydney J Womack, Abigail C Hoenes, Caroline Zeiss, Lawrence H Young and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. miScience · 2023
    Article
  10. Signaling Pathways and Potential Therapeutic Strategies in Cardiac Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Novel Therapeutics for Anthracycline Induced Cardiotoxicity.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nabil E BoutagySection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Attila FeherSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Daniel PfauSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Zhao LiuDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Nicole M GuerreraSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Lisa A FreeburgDepartment of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Sydney J WomackDepartment of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Abigail C HoenesDepartment of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Caroline ZeissSection of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Lawrence H YoungSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Francis G SpinaleDepartment of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.
Albert J SinusasSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Imaging Center · USUniversity of South Carolina · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Training In Multi-modality Molecular & Translational Cardiovascular ImagingT32HL098069 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES S DUNCAN, Georges El Fakhri · 2010 to 2026
$5.2M
VisualSonics Vevo 770 Imaging SystemS10RR023602 · NCRR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI YOUNG, LAWRENCE H · 2007 to 2007
$274k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDoxorubicin (DOX) induces cardiotoxicity in part by activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) exerts additive cardioprotective actions over renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in preclinical models of myocardial infarction and in heart failure patients. We hypothesized that Sac/Val would be more cardioprotective than Val in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, and this benefit would be associated with modulation of MMP activation.

objectivesWe sought to investigate the efficacy of Sac/Val for the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.

methodsMale Wistar rats received DOX intraperitoneally (15 mg/kg cumulative) or saline over 3 weeks. Following the first treatment, control animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), while DOX-treated animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), Val (31 mg/kg; n = 25) or Sac/Val (68 mg/kg; n = 25) for either 4 or 6 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, and 4 and 6 weeks after DOX initiation. In addition, myocardial MMP activity was assessed with

resultsLeft ventricular ejection fraction decreased by 10% at 6 weeks in DOX and DOX + Val rats (both p < 0.05), while this reduction was attenuated in DOX + Sac/Val rats. MMP activity was increased at 6 weeks by 76% in DOX-alone rats, and tended to increase in DOX + Val rats (36%; p = 0.051) but was similar in DOX + Sac/Val rats as compared with time-matched control animals. Both therapies attenuated histological evidence of cellular toxicity and fibrosis (p < 0.05).

conclusionsSac/Val offers greater protection against left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction compared with standard angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

Indexed as

anthracyclineechocardiographypreclinical studytreatment

Identifiers

PMID33437965
PMCPMC7799406
OpenAlexW3111514975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.