Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437828›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2020

Redo aortic valve replacement for prosthesis endocarditis in patients previously classified as high or prohibitive risk: a narrative review.

Francesco Pollari, Renate Ziegler, Francesco Nappi, Irena Großmann, Jörg Steinmann, Theodor Fischlein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metabolites · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco PollariDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Renate ZieglerInstitute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Francesco NappiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France.
Irena GroßmannDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Jörg SteinmannInstitute of Clinical Hygiene, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Theodor FischleinDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Medical Microbiology and Infectiology, Klinikum Nürnberg - Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and sutureless aortic valve replacement (Su-AVR) enabled in the last years many patients at high or prohibitive risk to be treated for their severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. As often happens in medicine, new techniques bring not only new hopes, but also new problems. In recent years, alongside the lengthening of the life of these patients treated with TAVI or Su-AVR, cardiologists and cardiac surgeons have had to face the long-term complications associated with the implantation of these devices, such as the prosthetic infective endocarditis. The correct management of prosthesis valve endocarditis after TAVI or Su-AVR in high risk patients, and the possible role of surgery are a matter of debate because pushing the limits of the modern medicine and becoming a new challenge for cardiac surgeons of 21

Indexed as

Endocarditis teaminfective endocarditissurgical high risksutureless prosthesistranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Identifiers

PMID33437828
PMCPMC7791219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.