Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437780›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2020

Infection biomarkers in assisting the judgement of blood stream infection and patient prognosis: a retrospective study incorporating principal components analysis.

Sheng Zhang, Xian Zhang, Wenbo Yu, Zhaofen Lin, Dechang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sheng ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xian ZhangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Wenbo YuGraduate School, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Zhaofen LinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University (Second Military Medical University), Shanghai, China.
Dechang ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate whether inexpensive and quickly available infection biomarkers including procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count, and percentage of neutrophils (N%) are helpful in assisting the judgement of blood culture results and patient prognosis.

methodsThis retrospective study included patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of Changzheng Hospital from July 2015 to June 2017 and had at least one episode of blood culture with matched infection biomarkers (PCT, CRP, WBC, and N%). Primary infection biomarkers were transformed into newly derived components using the principal component analysis (PCA) method. Each observation was plotted as a point on the component map using factor scores as coordinates. The distribution characteristics of patients with different blood culture results and prognosis were explored. The diagnostic performance of the components and infection biomarkers in the discrimination of blood culture results and patient prognosis were compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

resultsA total of 768 episodes of blood cultures from 436 patients were analyzed. Patients with positive blood cultures were associated with higher ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality, longer ICU stay and hospital stay (P<0.001 for all). In PCA, the 4 sets of primary infection biomarkers (PCT, CRP, WBC, and N%) were transformed into components 1 and 2. On the component map, observations of positive blood cultures were more likely to be distributed in the first and second quadrants than those of negative blood cultures (OR, 6.28, 95% CI, 4.14-9.64, P<0.001). Compared to patients with negative blood cultures, non-survivors with positive blood cultures were more likely to be distributed in the first and second quadrants (OR, 6.90, 95% CI, 2.67-20.98, P<0.001), followed by survivors with positive blood cultures (OR, 3.44, 95% CI, 1.97-6.13, P<0.001). PCT- and CRP-derived component had the largest area under curves (AUCs) in the discrimination of blood culture results (0.81) and patient prognosis (0.69).

conclusionsPCT- and CRP-derived component was more strongly associated with blood culture results and patient prognosis than WBC- and N%-derived component and primary biomarkers.

Indexed as

Blood stream infection (BSI)C-reactive protein (CRP)principal component analysis (PCA)procalcitonin (PCT)white blood cell (WBC)

Identifiers

PMID33437780
PMCPMC7791242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.