Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437754›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physics2020

Classification of Cancer Types Using Graph Convolutional Neural Networks.

Ricardo Ramirez, Yu-Chiao Chiu, Allen Hererra, Milad Mostavi, Joshua Ramirez, Yidong Chen, Yufei Huang, Yu-Fang Jin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Knowledge-Informed Machine Learning for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.IEEE transactions on automation science and engineering : a publication of the IEEE Robotics and Automation Society · 2025
    Article
  15. Evaluation of Au(III) complexes as Plasmodium falciparum aquaglyceroporin (PfAQP) inhibitors by in silico and in vitro methods.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ricardo RamirezDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Yu-Chiao ChiuGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Allen HererraDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Milad MostaviDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Joshua RamirezDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Yidong ChenGreehey Children's Cancer Research Institute, The University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Yufei HuangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.
Yu-Fang JinDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas 78249, USA.

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Robin Jean Leach · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATION OF MEDICINE & SCIENCE: A PARTNERSHIP TO IMPROVE HEALTHUL1RR025767 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A · 2008 to 2011
$23.8M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUM1TR004538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ROBERT A CLARK, Kenneth M Hargreaves · 2023 to 2026
$22.3M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR002645 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
Collaborative Research:Graphical models for characterizing global RNA methylationR01GM113245 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI HUANG, YUFEI · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
Deep learning of drug sensitivity and genetic dependency of pediatric cancer cellsK99CA248944 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CHIU, YU-CHIAO · 2020 to 2021
$212k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002645NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004538NCI NIH HHS K99 CA248944NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025767NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer has been a leading cause of death in the United States with significant health care costs. Accurate prediction of cancers at an early stage and understanding the genomic mechanisms that drive cancer development are vital to the improvement of treatment outcomes and survival rates, thus resulting in significant social and economic impacts. Attempts have been made to classify cancer types with machine learning techniques during the past two decades and deep learning approaches more recently.

resultsIn this paper, we established four models with graph convolutional neural network (GCNN) that use unstructured gene expressions as inputs to classify different tumor and non-tumor samples into their designated 33 cancer types or as normal. Four GCNN models based on a co-expression graph, co-expression+singleton graph, protein-protein interaction (PPI) graph, and PPI+singleton graph have been designed and implemented. They were trained and tested on combined 10,340 cancer samples and 731 normal tissue samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. The established GCNN models achieved excellent prediction accuracies (89.9-94.7%) among 34 classes (33 cancer types and a normal group).

conclusionNovel GCNN models have been established to predict cancer types or normal tissue based on gene expression profiles. We demonstrated the results from the TCGA dataset that these models can produce accurate classification (above 94%), using cancer-specific markers genes. The models and the source codes are publicly available and can be readily adapted to the diagnosis of cancer and other diseases by the data-driven modeling research community.

Indexed as

Cancer classification2Data-driven model4Deep learning3Graph convolutional neural network1The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)5

Identifiers

PMID33437754
PMCPMC7799442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.