Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437665›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2020

Overall and cause-specific survival for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands: Analysis of 2210 patients.

Zachary C Taylor, Erin A Kaya, Jeffrey D Bunn, Zachary D Guss, Brian J Mitchell, Robert K Fairbanks, Wayne T Lamoreaux, Aaron E Wagner, Ben J Peressini, Christopher M Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Does the site of origin of mucoepidermoid carcinoma impact treatment outcomes? Long-term analysis of 244 patients over a decade.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Oncocytic salivary gland carcinomas.Histology and histopathology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zachary C TaylorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Erin A KayaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Jeffrey D BunnSurgery, Spokane Ear, Nose, and Throat, Spokane, WA 99201, United States.
Zachary D GussDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Brian J MitchellSurgery, Spokane Ear, Nose, and Throat, Spokane, WA 99201, United States.
Robert K FairbanksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Wayne T LamoreauxDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Aaron E WagnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States.
Ben J PeressiniDepartment of Biostatistics, DataWorks Northwest, LLC, Coeur D'Alene, ID 83815, United States.
Christopher M LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA 99202, United States. lee@ccnw.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is a rare malignancy of the head and neck; however, it accounts for a majority of the tumors of the salivary glands. This study used a national population-based registry to describe the pre-treatment and treatment-related prognostic factors that influence survival in patients with MEC of the major salivary glands. To our knowledge, this is the largest population-based study examining predictors of both overall and cause-specific survival of MEC of the major salivary glands.

aimTo identify prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) of patients with MEC of the major salivary glands.

methodsWe used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results Database of the National Cancer Institute to investigate a variety of factors that could influence survival of patients diagnosed with mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the major salivary glands. A total of 2210 patients diagnosed with MEC of the major salivary glands during the years of 1975-2016 were studied. The primary endpoints were OS and CSS. Cox regression analysis was used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical variables such as age at diagnosis, diagnosis year, sex, race, tumor size, stage, grade, treatment with or without surgical excision, and adjuvant radiotherapy treatment.

resultsA total of 2210 patients diagnosed with MEC of the major salivary glands met inclusion criteria. In this study, 95% of patients underwent surgical excision and 41% received adjuvant radiation therapy. Median OS time for Grade I, II, and III/IV was 401 mo (± 48.25, 95%CI), 340 mo (± 33.68, 95%CI) and 55 mo (± 11.05, 95%CI), respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that lack of surgical excision was associated with decreased OS [hazard ratio (HR) 4.26,

conclusionMultivariate analysis demonstrated increasing age, advanced tumor stage, increasing tumor size, Grade III carcinoma, male sex, and lack of surgical excision were associated with decreased OS and CSS (

Indexed as

Head and neck cancerMajor salivary glandsMucoepidermoid carcinomaPrognostic factorsSalivary gland neoplasiaSurveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results

Identifiers

PMID33437665
PMCPMC7769719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.