Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437545›Full record

ArticleCureus2020

Utility of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Evaluation of Lymphadenopathy.

Atif A Hashmi, Samreen Naz, Omer Ahmed, Syed Rafay Yaqeen, Muhammad Irfan, Anwar Kamal, Naveen Faridi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Atif A HashmiPathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Samreen NazPathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Omer AhmedInternal Medicine, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Syed Rafay YaqeenInternal Medicine, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, PAK.
Muhammad IrfanStatistics, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Anwar KamalPathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Naveen FaridiPathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a quick, effective and relatively inexpensive technique to evaluate the visibly accessible superficial masses. As cervical, axillary and inguinal lymphadenopathies are commonly encountered clinical problems, in this study, we evaluated the utility of FNAC for assessment of lymphadenopathy. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Cytopathology, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, over the duration of three years. A total of 559 cases were included in the study that underwent FNAC. After palpation, two to three passes were performed with a 22-23 gauge needle along with a plunger for FNAC. The obtained material was spread on three slides that were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E), Papanicolaou (PAP), and Diff-Quik methods. The remaining material was used for cell block preparation. Results The mean age of the patients was 37.05±18.03 years. In 98.7% of cases, the material was adequate for a satisfactory cytological examination. The most common site of FNAC was the cervical lymph node and tuberculous lymphadenitis (37%) was the most common diagnosis on FNAC, followed by reactive lymphadenitis (27.2%). Reactive lymphadenitis was seen more frequently in the younger age group (<15 years), whereas metastatic carcinoma was more commonly seen in the older age group (>50 years). Tuberculous lymphadenitis was noted more frequently in the middle age group (16-35 years). Moreover, tuberculous lymphadenitis was noted more commonly in cervical lymph nodes, while metastatic carcinoma was more frequently observed in axillary and inguinal lymph node FNACs. Conclusion FNAC is a quick and reliable method to categorize the cause of lymphadenopathy into reactive, inflammatory/infectious, metastatic, and lymphoproliferative, avoiding the necessity of an incisional/trucut biopsy. Moreover, age, gender, and site of involvement are useful predictors of the cause of lymphadenopathy. We noted that in the younger age group, reactive lymphadenitis was more common, whereas tuberculous lymphadenitis and metastatic carcinoma were more frequent in middle and older age groups, respectively. On a similar note, tuberculous lymphadenitis was more frequent in cervical lymph nodes than axillary and inguinal lymph nodes, while metastatic carcinoma was more common in these latter two sites.

Indexed as

cytologyfine needle aspiration cytology (fnac)hodgkin’s lymphomalymphadenopathylymphoproliferative disordermetastatic carcinomareactive lymphadenitistuberculosis (tb)tuberculous (tb) lymphadenitis

Identifiers

PMID33437545
PMCPMC7793337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.