Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33437500›Full record

ArticleFuture science OA2020

Inducible clindamycin resistance and

Roshan Timsina, Upasana Shrestha, Anjana Singh, Bivek Timalsina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future science OA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multidrug-Resistant Sepsis: A Critical Healthcare Challenge.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Antibiotic Resistance Profiles and MLST Typing ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Welcome to volume 8 ofFuture science OA · 2022
    Article
  16. Inducible Clindamycin-ResistantInternational journal of microbiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Mechanisms of Resistance to Macrolide Antibiotics amongAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roshan TimsinaCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Upasana ShresthaCenter for Health & Disease Studies-Nepal (CHDS), Shankhamul, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1249-4314
Anjana SinghCentral Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Bivek TimalsinaCenter for Health & Disease Studies-Nepal (CHDS), Shankhamul, Kathmandu, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-0780
Tribhuvan University · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimResistance to methicillin and Macrolide-Lincosamide and Streptogramins B and their association with MATERIALS &

methodsNonduplicate nasal swabs from 160 school children were collected from April to September 2018 and processed using standard microbiological procedures.

resultsOut of 160 samples, 64 (40%) were

conclusionTo prevent treatment failure by inducible resistance, D-test must be performed on erythromycin-resistant and/or clindamycin-sensitive isolates.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceD-testermerythromycininducible clindamycin resistancemethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusNepal

Identifiers

PMID33437500
PMCPMC7787115
OpenAlexW3094154313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.