ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2021
Investigation of factors associated with reduced clinical benefits of personalized peptide vaccination for pancreatic cancer.
Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the factors associated with reduced clinical benefits of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for pancreatic cancer. Phase II PPV clinical trials comprising 309 (8 non-advanced and 301 advanced-stage) patients with pancreatic cancer were conducted. Two to four peptides were selected among a set of 31 different peptides as vaccine candidates for personalized peptide vaccination based on human leukocyte antigen types and preexisting peptide-specific IgG levels, and subcutaneously injected. The selected peptides were subcutaneously injected. Of the 309 patients, 81 failed to complete the 1st PPV cycle due to rapid disease progression, and their median overall survival [2.1 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.8-2.7] was significantly shorter than that of the remaining 228 patients (8.4 months; 95% CI, 8.4-9.9; P<0.01). 'Immune boosting' was defined when IgG levels before vaccination increased more than 2-fold after vaccination. Immune boosting was observed in the majority of patients with PPV irrespective of whether or not they received concomitant chemotherapy. Additionally, patients demonstrating immune boosting exhibited longer survival rates. Although the positive-response rates and peptide-specific IgG levels in pre- and post-vaccination samples differed among the 31 peptides, patients exhibiting immune boosting in response to each of the vaccinated peptides demonstrated longer survival times. Pre-vaccination factors associated with reduced clinical benefits were high c-reactive protein (CRP) levels, high neutrophil counts, lower lymphocyte and red blood cell counts, advanced disease stage and the greater number of chemotherapy courses prior to the PPV treatment. The post-vaccination factors associated with lower clinical benefits were PPV monotherapy and lower levels of immune boosting. In conclusion, pre-vaccination inflammatory signatures, rather than pre- or post-vaccination immunological signatures, were associated with reduced clinical benefits of personalized peptide vaccination (PPV) for pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.