ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2020
A novel transverse talar tunnel achieved less vessel damage and better drilling safety for ATFL reconstruction: a cadaveric study with three-dimensional microCT.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo introduce a novel transverse tunnel (TT) in anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) reconstruction, and assess whether it was superior to the tunnels currently used.
methodsThirteen fresh cadaveric lower extremities were perfused with lead-based contrast. Talar tunnels were drilled from the ATFL insertion in the following directions: transversely towards the medial side (TT), towards the talar neck (TNT), and towards the anterior, distal, and posterior points of the medial malleolus (AMMT, DMMT, and PMMT, respectively). MicroCT was used to reconstruct the tali, and virtual transosseous and 20-mm blind-ended tunnels were generated. The graft bending angle, vascular compromise caused by the tunnels, and the minimum distances from the tunnels to the chondral surfaces were evaluated.
resultsThe bending angles between the ATFL and the TT, TNT, AMMT, DMMT, and PMMT were 47.3±7.9°, 41.5±7.7°, 57.0±6.0°, 63.9±11.7°, and 87.9±6.2°, respectively. The proportion of damaged intraosseous vessels was significantly less for the TT (7.8±2.7%) compared with the AMMT (10.0±5.2%), DMMT (15.5±6.5%), and PMMT (16.9±3.9%). Both the TNT and the AMMT carried a high risk of joint penetration, with respective minimum distances of 2.2±1.7 mm and 1.4±1.0 mm from the tunnel to the cartilage; in contrast, the TT, DMMT, and PMMT had larger safety margins, with minimum distances of 5.4±0.8 mm, 8.9+2.7 mm, and 6.0±1.2 mm. The blind-ended tunnels caused less vascular compromise and had larger minimum distances to the cartilage (better drilling safety) than the transosseous tunnels for all tunnel directions.
conclusionThe TT achieves a superior graft bending angle and intraosseous blood supply protection than the AMMT, DMMT, and PMMT, and is less likely to result in cartilage damage than the TNT. The 20-mm blind-ended tunnels achieve less vessel damage and better drilling safety than transosseous tunnels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33437380PMC7791527What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.