ArticleScientific reports2021
A deep learning framework combined with word embedding to identify DNA replication origins.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretable prediction of DNA replication origins in S. cerevisiae using DNABERT and DNABERT-2.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Computational prediction of replication origins: a comparative review of methods, benchmarks, and trends from heuristics to deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Investigation of cell development and tissue structure network based on natural Language processing of scRNA-seq data.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- DNA sequence analysis landscape: a comprehensive review of DNA sequence analysis task types, databases, datasets, word embedding methods, and language models.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Genome language modeling (GLM): a beginner's cheat sheet.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Article
- Discovering genomic islands in unannotated bacterial genomes using sequence embedding.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Deep learning and support vector machines for transcription start site identification.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- Genomic Surveillance of COVID-19 Variants With Language Models and Machine Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The DNA replication influences the inheritance of genetic information in the DNA life cycle. As the distribution of replication origins (ORIs) is the major determinant to precisely regulate the replication process, the correct identification of ORIs is significant in giving an insightful understanding of DNA replication mechanisms and the regulatory mechanisms of genetic expressions. For eukaryotes in particular, multiple ORIs exist in each of their gene sequences to complete the replication in a reasonable period of time. To simplify the identification process of eukaryote's ORIs, most of existing methods are developed by traditional machine learning algorithms, and target to the gene sequences with a fixed length. Consequently, the identification results are not satisfying, i.e. there is still great room for improvement. To break through the limitations in previous studies, this paper develops sequence segmentation methods, and employs the word embedding technique, 'Word2vec', to convert gene sequences into word vectors, thereby grasping the inner correlations of gene sequences with different lengths. Then, a deep learning framework to perform the ORI identification task is constructed by a convolutional neural network with an embedding layer. On the basis of the analysis of similarity reduction dimensionality diagram, Word2vec can effectively transform the inner relationship among words into numerical feature. For four species in this study, the best models are obtained with the overall accuracy of 0.975, 0.765, 0.885, 0.967, the Matthew's correlation coefficient of 0.940, 0.530, 0.771, 0.934, and the AUC of 0.975, 0.800, 0.888, 0.981, which indicate that the proposed predictor has a stable ability and provide a high confidence coefficient to classify both of ORIs and non-ORIs. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, the proposed predictor can achieve ORI identification with significant improvement. It is therefore reasonable to anticipate that the proposed method will make a useful high throughput tool for genome analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.