Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436962›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Comparing the protective effects of resveratrol, curcumin and sulforaphane against LPS/IFN-γ-mediated inflammation in doxorubicin-treated macrophages.

Haidy A Saleh, Eman Ramdan, Mohey M Elmazar, Hassan M E Azzazy, Anwar Abdelnaser

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Coixol and Sinigrin fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. GEO dataset mining analysis reveals novelFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What nature has to offer: Opportunities for immuno-oncology.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Nutrients · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haidy A SalehDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt.
Eman RamdanDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohey M ElmazarDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Hassan M E AzzazyDepartment of Chemistry, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt. hazzazy@aucegypt.edu.
Anwar AbdelnaserInstitute of Global Public Health, School of Sciences and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, AUC Avenue, P.O. Box 74, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt. anwar.abdelnaser@aucegypt.edu.
British University in Egypt · EGAmerican University in Cairo · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Doxorubicin (DOX) chemotherapy is associated with the release of inflammatory cytokines from macrophages. This has been suggested to be, in part, due to DOX-mediated leakage of endotoxins from gut microflora, which activate Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling in macrophages, causing severe inflammation. However, the direct function of DOX on macrophages is still unknown. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that DOX alone is incapable of stimulating inflammatory response in macrophages. Then, we compared the anti-inflammatory effects of curcumin (CUR), resveratrol (RES) and sulforaphane (SFN) against lipopolysaccharide/interferon-gamma (LPS/IFN-γ)-mediated inflammation in the absence or presence of DOX. For this purpose, RAW 264.7 cells were stimulated with LPS/IFN-γ (10 ng/mL/10 U/mL) in the absence or presence of DOX (0.1 µM). Our results showed that DOX alone is incapable of stimulating an inflammatory response in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Furthermore, after 24 h of incubation with LPS/IFN-γ, a significant increase in tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA levels was observed. Similarly, nitric oxide (NO) production and TNF-α and IL-6 protein levels were significantly upregulated. Moreover, in LPS/IFN-γ-treated macrophages, the microRNAs (miRNAs) miR-146a, miR-155, and miR-21 were significantly overexpressed. Interestingly, upon testing CUR, RES, and SFN against LPS/IFN-γ-mediated inflammation, only SFN was able to significantly reverse the LPS/IFN-γ-mediated induction of iNOS, TNF-α and IL-6 and attenuate miR-146a and miR-155 levels. In conclusion, SFN, at the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels, exhibits potent immunomodulatory action against LPS/IFN-γ-stimulated macrophages, which may indicate SFN as a potential treatment for DOX-associated inflammation.

Indexed as

Immunologic FactorsAnimalsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCurcuminDoxorubicinInflammationInflammation MediatorsInterferon-gammaInterleukin-6IsothiocyanatesLipopolysaccharidesMacrophagesMiceMolecular Targeted TherapyNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIRAW 264.7 CellsAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCurcuminDoxorubicinImmunologic FactorsInflammation MediatorsInterferon-gammaInterleukin-6IsothiocyanatesLipopolysaccharidesNitric Oxide Synthase Type IIResveratrolRNA, MessengersulforaphaneSulfoxidesTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID33436962
PMCPMC7803961
OpenAlexW3119657937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.