ArticleScientific reports2021
Quantitative assessment of pulmonary artery occlusion using lung dynamic perfusion CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulmonary regional blood flow: validation of low-dose two-volume dynamic CT perfusion imaging in a swine model.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative measurement of lung perfusion is a promising tool to evaluate lung pathophysiology as well as to assess disease severity and monitor treatment. However, this novel technique has not been adopted clinically due to various technical and physiological challenges; and it is still in the early developmental phase where the correlation between lung pathophysiology and perfusion maps is being explored. The purpose of this research work is to quantify the impact of pulmonary artery occlusion on lung perfusion indices using lung dynamic perfusion CT (DPCT). We performed Lung DPCT in ten anesthetized, mechanically ventilated juvenile pigs (18.6-20.2 kg) with a range of reversible pulmonary artery occlusions (0%, 40-59%, 60-79%, 80-99%, and 100%) created with a balloon catheter. For each arterial occlusion, DPCT data was analyzed using first-pass kinetics to derive blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV) and mean transit time (MTT) perfusion maps. Two radiologists qualitatively assessed perfusion maps for the presence or absence of perfusion defects. Perfusion maps were also analyzed quantitatively using a linear segmented mixed model to determine the thresholds of arterial occlusion associated with perfusion derangement. Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Kappa statistics. Correlation between arterial occlusion and perfusion indices was evaluated using the Spearman-rank correlation coefficient. Our results determined that perfusion defects were detected qualitatively in BF, BV and MTT perfusion maps for occlusions larger than 55%, 80% and 55% respectively. Inter-observer agreement was very good with Kappa scores > 0.92. Quantitative analysis of the perfusion maps determined the arterial occlusion threshold for perfusion defects was 50%, 76% and 44% for BF, BV and MTT respectively. Spearman-rank correlation coefficients between arterial occlusion and normalized perfusion values were strong (- 0.92, - 0.72, and 0.78 for BF, BV and MTT, respectively) and were statically significant (p < 0.01). These findings demonstrate that lung DPCT enables quantification and stratification of pulmonary artery occlusion into three categories: mild, moderate and severe. Severe (occlusion ≥ 80%) alters all perfusion indices; mild (occlusion < 55%) has no detectable effect. Moderate (occlusion 55-80%) impacts BF and MTT but BV is preserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.