ArticleScientific reports2021
The long developmental trajectory of body representation plasticity following tool use.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dynamic bodily self across lifespan: Agency, ownership, and the plasticity of internal body models.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Age-related differences in embodying a tool under visual deprivation.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Global remapping of the sensory homunculus emerges early in childhood development.Nature communications · 2026Article
- From adolescence to old age: how sensory precision shapes body ownership during physiological aging.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Developmental changes of bodily self-consciousness in adolescent girls.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The different impact of attention, movement, and sensory information on body metric representation.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Deletion of a conserved genomic region associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis leads to vertebral rotation in mice.Human molecular genetics · 2024Article
- Knowing your boundaries: no effect of tool-use on body representation following a gather-and-sort task.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Emergence of sense of body ownership but not agency during virtual tool-use training is associated with an altered body schema.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Positive or negative environmental modulations on human brain development: the morpho-functional outcomes of music training or stress.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Review
- A conceptual framework on body representations and their relevance for mental disorders.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Trends in Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The Effect of COVID-19.Journal of athletic training · 2022Article
- Body Processing in Children and Adolescents with Traumatic Brain Injury: An Exploratory Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Are tools truly incorporated as an extension of the body representation?: Assessing the evidence for tool embodiment.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- Improving Body Representation and Motor Skills with a Preschool Education Program: A Preliminary Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Humans evolution is distinctly characterized by their exquisite mastery of tools, allowing them to shape their environment in more elaborate ways compared to other species. This ability is present ever since infancy and most theories indicate that children become proficient with tool use very early. In adults, tool use has been shown to plastically modify metric aspects of the arm representation, as indexed by changes in movement kinematics. To date, whether and when the plastic capability of updating the body representation develops during childhood remains unknown. This question is particularly important since body representation plasticity could be impacted by the fact that the human body takes years to achieve a stable metric configuration. Here we assessed the kinematics of 90 young participants (8-21 years old) required to reach for an object before and after tool use, as a function of their pubertal development. Results revealed that tool incorporation, as indexed by the adult typical kinematic pattern, develops very slowly and displays a u-shaped developmental trajectory. From early to mid puberty, the changes in kinematics following tool use seem to reflect a shortened arm representation, opposite to what was previously reported in adults. This pattern starts reversing after mid puberty, which is characterized by the lack of any kinematics change following tool use. The typical adult-like pattern emerges only at late puberty, when body size is stable. These findings reveal the complex dynamics of tool incorporation across development, possibly indexing the transition from a vision-based to a proprioception-based body representation plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.