Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436748›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Local knowledge as a tool for prospecting wild food plants: experiences in northeastern Brazil.

Patrícia Muniz de Medeiros, Gabriela Maria Cota Dos Santos, Déborah Monteiro Barbosa, Laílson César Andrade Gomes, Élida Monique da Costa Santos, Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patrícia Muniz de MedeirosLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil. patricia.medeiros@ceca.ufal.br.
Gabriela Maria Cota Dos SantosLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil.
Déborah Monteiro BarbosaLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil.
Laílson César Andrade GomesLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil.
Élida Monique da Costa SantosLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil.
Rafael Ricardo Vasconcelos da SilvaLaboratóry of Biocultural Ecology, Conservation and Evolution, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Campus de Engenharias e Ciências Agrárias. BR-104, Rio Largo, AL, 57100-000, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to provide a simple framework to identify wild food plants with potential for popularization based on local knowledge and perception. To this end, we also characterized the distribution of this knowledge in the socio-ecological system. We developed the study in the rural settlement Dom Hélder Câmara in northeastern Brazil. The species with the greatest potential for popularization considering the attributes accessed from local knowledge and perception were Psidium guineense Sw., Genipa americana L., Xanthosoma sagittifolium (L.) Schott and Dioscorea trifida L.f. However, the high variation in local knowledge on wild food plants suggests that species that are not frequently cited can also be promising. The absence of age or gender-related knowledge patterns indicates that studies for prospecting wild food plants in similar socioecological contexts need to reach the population as a whole, rather than focusing on a specific group.

Identifiers

PMID33436748
PMCPMC7804287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.