ArticleScientific reports2021
Newborns' sensitivity to speed changes as a building block for animacy perception.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perception of animacy leads to expectation of goal-directed behaviour in dogs.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Human newborns spontaneously attend to prosocial interactions.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A symmetry-based mechanism for perceptual grouping in preverbal infants.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Noncortical coding of biological motion in newborn chicks' brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Innate sensitivity to face-to-face biological motion.iScience · 2024Article
- The domestic chick as an animal model of autism spectrum disorder: building adaptive social perceptions through prenatally formed predispositions.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Perception of animate motion in dogs.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Decomposing unaccusativity: a statistical modelling approach.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024Article
- I like the way you move: how animate motion affects visual attention in early human infancy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Infants are sensitive to the social signaling value of shared inefficient behaviors.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Identifying critical kinematic features of animate motion and contribution to animacy perception.iScience · 2023Article
- Naïve chicks do not prefer objects with stable body orientation, though they may prefer behavioural variability.Animal cognition · 2023Article
- Perceiving animacy from kinematics: visual specification of life-likeness in simple geometric patterns.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- When shapes are more than shapes: perceptual, developmental, and neurophysiological basis for attributions of animacy and theory of mind.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Life is in motion (through a chick's eye).Animal cognition · 2023Review
- A cautionary note on the studies using the picture-word interference paradigm: the unwelcome consequences of the random use of "in/animates".Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Chasing perception in domestic cats and dogs.Animal cognition · 2022Article
- Spontaneous preference for unpredictability in the temporal contingencies between agents' motion in naive domestic chicks.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Pupil size changes reveal dogs' sensitivity to motion cues.iScience · 2022Article
- Selection for specific behavioural traits does not influence preference of chasing motion and visual strategy in dogs.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human visual system can discriminate between animate beings vs. inanimate objects on the basis of some kinematic cues, such as starting from rest and speed changes by self-propulsion. The ontogenetic origin of such capability is still under debate. Here we investigate for the first time whether newborns manifest an attentional bias toward objects that abruptly change their speed along a trajectory as contrasted with objects that move at a constant speed. To this end, we systematically manipulated the motion speed of two objects. An object that moves with a constant speed was contrasted with an object that suddenly increases (Experiment 1) or with one that suddenly decreases its speed (Experiment 2). When presented with a single speed change, newborns did not show any visual preference. However, newborns preferred an object that abruptly increases and then decreases its speed (Experiment 3), but they did not show any visual preference for the reverse sequence pattern (Experiment 4). Overall, results are discussed in line with the hypothesis of the existence of attentional biases in newborns that trigger their attention towards some visual cues of motion that characterized animate perception in adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.