ArticleScientific reports2021
Development of air pressure mirroring particle dispersion method for producing high-density tungsten medical radiation shielding film.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation shielding films used in medical institutions are manufactured by mixing polymer materials with eco-friendly shielding materials. However, it is not easy to distribute the shielding material particles uniformly during the process. The uniform distribution of the shielding material particles is key to the reproducibility of the shielding performance of the films. Therefore, in this study, an air pressure mirroring particle dispersion method was developed to maintain a uniform distribution of the shielding material by dispersing the shielding material on a curved reflector through an air nozzle. The particle distribution state, density, and shielding performance of the cross-section and surface of the shielding films developed using the single-sided dispersion, double-dispersion, and air pressure mirroring particle dispersion methods were evaluated. Compared to the conventional single-sided distribution method, the shielding film produced by the air pressure mirroring particle dispersion method increased the particle packing by 41.5%, density by 12.9%, shielding material content by 22.2%, and shielding performance by 21.4%. Thus, the proposed dispersion method enables better shielding performance through uniform dispersion of shielding material, which is the most important parameter in the manufacture of low-dose shielding films.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.