Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436676›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Fine-scale genetic structure in the critically endangered red-fronted macaw in the absence of geographic and ecological barriers.

Guillermo Blanco, Francisco Morinha, Séverine Roques, Fernando Hiraldo, Abraham Rojas, José L Tella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Exploring the endangerment mechanisms ofEcology and evolution · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Guillermo BlancoDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. g.blanco@csic.es.
Francisco MorinhaDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, National Museum of Natural Sciences (MNCN), Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain.
Séverine RoquesIrstea-UR EABX, Ecosystèmes Aquatiques et Changements Globaux, Equipe FREEMA, 50 avenue de Verdun, 33 612, Cestas, France.
Fernando HiraldoDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Abraham RojasZoológico Municipal de Fauna Sudamericana, Radial 27, Tercer Anillo Interno, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia.
José L TellaDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), Avda. Américo Vespucio, 41092, Sevilla, Spain.
Estación Biológica de Doñana · ESCEA CESTA · FRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural and socio-cultural traits are recognized in the restriction of gene flow in species with high cognitive capacity and complex societies. This isolation by social barriers has been generally overlooked in threatened species by assuming disrupted gene flow due to population fragmentation and decline. We examine the genetic structure and ecology of the global population of the Critically Endangered red-fronted macaw (Ara rubrogenys), an endemic species to the inter-Andean valleys of Bolivia. We found a fine-scale genetic structuring in four genetic clusters. Genetic diversity was higher in wild compared to captive-bred macaws, but similar to that of captive wild-caught macaws. We found no clear evidence of severe genetic erosion in the population in recent decades, but it was patent in historic times, overlapping with drastic human habitat transformation and macaw persecution over millennia. We found no evidence of geographical and ecological barriers, owing to the high dispersal ability, nesting and foraging habits between genetic clusters. The lack of genetic intermixing despite long-distance foraging and seasonal movements suggests recruitment in natal colonies and other social factors reinforcing philopatry-related genetic structure. Conservation efforts should be specifically focussed on major threats in each genetic cluster as independent conservation units, and also considered in ex-situ management.

Indexed as

EcosystemEndangered SpeciesGene FlowGenetic StructuresGeographySocial BehaviorAnimal MigrationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBoliviaCognitionConservation of Natural ResourcesGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationMultigene FamilyParrots

Identifiers

PMID33436676
PMCPMC7804180
OpenAlexW3120567175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.