Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436511›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

FADU: a Quantification Tool for Prokaryotic Transcriptomic Analyses.

Matthew Chung, Ricky S Adkins, John S A Mattick, Katie R Bradwell, Amol C Shetty, Lisa Sadzewicz, Luke J Tallon, Claire M Fraser, David A Rasko, Anup Mahurkar and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metal-independent effects of calprotectin on cocultures ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Uniform pre-processing of bacterial single-cell RNA-seq.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Calprotectin protectsmSystems · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. mSphere · 2024
    Article
  17. DistinctbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  18. DistinctFrontiers in microbiomes · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew ChungInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9545-523X
Ricky S AdkinsInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
John S A MattickInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Katie R BradwellInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Amol C ShettyInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Lisa SadzewiczInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Luke J TallonInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Claire M FraserInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David A RaskoInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7337-7154
Anup MahurkarInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Julie C Dunning HotoppInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA jdhotopp@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3862-986X
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Technology CoreU19AI110820 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DUNNING HOTOPP, JULIE · 2014 to 2023
$36.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification tools for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analyses are often designed and tested using human transcriptomics data sets, in which full-length transcript sequences are well annotated. For prokaryotic transcriptomics experiments, full-length transcript sequences are seldom known, and coding sequences must instead be used for quantification steps in RNA-Seq analyses. However, operons confound accurate quantification of coding sequences since a single transcript does not necessarily equate to a single gene. Here, we introduce FADU (Feature Aggregate Depth Utility), a quantification tool designed specifically for prokaryotic RNA-Seq analyses. FADU assigns partial count values proportional to the length of the fragment overlapping the target feature. To assess the ability of FADU to quantify genes in prokaryotic transcriptomics analyses, we compared its performance to those of eXpress, featureCounts, HTSeq, kallisto, and Salmon across three paired-end read data sets of (i)

Indexed as

bacteriadifferential expressionoperonpolycistronic transcriptsread countsoftwaretranscriptometranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID33436511
PMCPMC7901478
OpenAlexW3120148725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.