Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436468›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention delivered in schools to prevent adolescent depression: the Future Proofing Study.

Joanne R Beames, Raghu Lingam, Katherine Boydell, Alison L Calear, Michelle Torok, Kate Maston, Isabel Zbukvic, Kit Huckvale, Philip J Batterham, Helen Christensen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Strategies for Enhancing the Implementation of Universal Mental Health Prevention Programs in Schools: A Systematic Review.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Trial collaborators' perceptions of the process of delivering Healthy Beginnings advice via telephone calls or text messages.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne R BeamesBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3630-0980
Raghu LingamSchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Katherine BoydellBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Michelle TorokBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Kate MastonBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Isabel ZbukvicOrygen The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kit HuckvaleBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Helen ChristensenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aliza Werner-SeidlerBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia a.werner-seidler@blackdog.org.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9046-6159
Black Dog Institute · AUAustralian National University · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcess evaluations provide insight into how interventions are delivered across varying contexts and why interventions work in some contexts and not in others. This manuscript outlines the protocol for a process evaluation embedded in a cluster randomised trial of a digital depression prevention intervention delivered to secondary school students (the Future Proofing Study). The purpose is to describe the methods that will be used to capture process evaluation data within this trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using a hybrid type 1 design, a mixed-methods approach will be used with data collected in the intervention arm of the Future Proofing Study. Data collection methods will include semistructured interviews with school staff and study facilitators, automatically collected intervention usage data and participant questionnaires (completed by school staff, school counsellors, study facilitators and students). Information will be collected about: (1) how the intervention was implemented in schools, including fidelity; (2) school contextual factors and their association with intervention reach, uptake and acceptability; (3) how school staff, study facilitators and students responded to delivering or completing the intervention. How these factors relate to trial effectiveness outcomes will also be assessed. Overall synthesis of the data will provide school cluster-level and individual-level process outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of New South Wales (NSW) Human Research Ethics Committee (HC180836; 21st January 2019) and the NSW Government State Education Research Applications Process (SERAP 2019201; 19th August 2019). Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and discussed at conferences. Our process evaluation will contextualise the trial findings with respect to how the intervention may have worked in some schools but not in others. This evaluation will inform the development of a model for rolling out digital interventions for the prevention of mental illness in schools. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ANZCTRN12619000855123; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377664&isReview=true.

Indexed as

DepressionSchool Health ServicesAdolescentEducational StatusHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSchoolsStudentschild & adolescent psychiatrydepression & mood disorderspreventive medicine

Identifiers

PMID33436468
PMCPMC7805380
OpenAlexW3120321037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.