Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436435›Full record

ReviewmBio2021

Preserve a Voucher Specimen! The Critical Need for Integrating Natural History Collections in Infectious Disease Studies.

Cody W Thompson, Kendra L Phelps, Marc W Allard, Joseph A Cook, Jonathan L Dunnum, Adam W Ferguson, Magnus Gelang, Faisal Ali Anwarali Khan, Deborah L Paul, DeeAnn M Reeder and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Global natural history infrastructure requires international solidarity, support, and investment in local capacity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Pathogen prospecting of museums: Reconstructing malaria epidemiology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Cody W Thompson *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA cwthomp@umich.edu phelps@ecohealthalliance.org.ORCID 0000-0002-6686-6056
Kendra L Phelps *EcoHealth Alliance, New York, New York, USA cwthomp@umich.edu phelps@ecohealthalliance.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3120-4802
Marc W AllardCenter of Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA.
Joseph A CookMuseum of Southwestern Biology, Biology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Jonathan L DunnumMuseum of Southwestern Biology, Biology Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Adam W FergusonGantz Family Collections Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Magnus GelangGothenburg Natural History Museum, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Faisal Ali Anwarali KhanFaculty of Resource Science and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Deborah L PaulFlorida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
DeeAnn M ReederBucknell University, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
Nancy B SimmonsDepartment of Mammalogy, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA.
Maarten P M VanhoveHasselt University, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity and Toxicology, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Paul W WebalaDepartment of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Maasai Mara University, Narok, Kenya.
Marcelo WekslerDepartamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8111-4779
C William KilpatrickUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Funding

Defense Threat Reduction Agency HDTRA11710064National Science Foundation DBI-1547229National Science Foundation NSF2033482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being nearly 10 months into the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, the definitive animal host for SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), the causal agent of COVID-19, remains unknown. Unfortunately, similar problems exist for other betacoronaviruses, and no vouchered specimens exist to corroborate host species identification for most of these pathogens. This most basic information is critical to the full understanding and mitigation of emerging zoonotic diseases. To overcome this hurdle, we recommend that host-pathogen researchers adopt vouchering practices and collaborate with natural history collections to permanently archive microbiological samples and host specimens. Vouchered specimens and associated samples provide both repeatability and extension to host-pathogen studies, and using them mobilizes a large workforce (i.e., biodiversity scientists) to assist in pandemic preparedness. We review several well-known examples that successfully integrate host-pathogen research with natural history collections (e.g., yellow fever, hantaviruses, helminths). However, vouchering remains an underutilized practice in such studies. Using an online survey, we assessed vouchering practices used by microbiologists (e.g., bacteriologists, parasitologists, virologists) in host-pathogen research. A much greater number of respondents permanently archive microbiological samples than archive host specimens, and less than half of respondents voucher host specimens from which microbiological samples were lethally collected. To foster collaborations between microbiologists and natural history collections, we provide recommendations for integrating vouchering techniques and archiving of microbiological samples into host-pathogen studies. This integrative approach exemplifies the premise underlying One Health initiatives, providing critical infrastructure for addressing related issues ranging from public health to global climate change and the biodiversity crisis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityBiomedical ResearchCommunicable DiseasesCOVID-19Host-Pathogen InteractionsHumansMuseumsNatural HistorySARS-CoV-2Specimen HandlingZoonosesbiorepositoriescoronavirusesextended specimenholistic specimenmuseumszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33436435
PMCPMC7844540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.