Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436338›Full record

ArticleJournal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS2021

Microcomputed analysis of nerve angioarchitecture after combined stem cell delivery and surgical angiogenesis to nerve allograft.

T M Saffari, F Mathot, R Thaler, A J van Wijnen, A T Bishop, A Y Shin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing Peripheral Nerve Regeneration (Nerve SPACE 2025).Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

T M SaffariDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive- and Hand Surgery, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
F MathotDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Plastic-, Reconstructive- and Hand Surgery, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
R ThalerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
A J van WijnenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
A T BishopDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
A Y ShinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States. Electronic address: shin.alexander@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Bridging the gap: Angiogenesis and stem cell seeding of processed nerve allograftR01NS102360 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SHIN, ALEXANDER Y. · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS102360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA detailed three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of microvasculature is evolving to be a powerful tool, providing mechanistic understanding of angiomodulating strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microvascular architecture of nerve allografts after combined stem cell delivery and surgical angiogenesis in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 25 Lewis rats, sciatic nerve gaps were repaired with (i) autografts, (ii) allografts, (iii) allografts wrapped in a pedicled superficial inferior epigastric artery fascia (SIEF) flap to provide surgical angiogenesis, combined with (iv) undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) and (v) MSCs differentiated into Schwann cell-like cells. At two weeks, vascular volume was measured using microcomputed tomography, and percentage and volume of vessels at different diameters were evaluated and compared with controls.

resultsThe vascular volume was significantly greatest in allografts treated with undifferentiated MSCs and surgical angiogenesis combined as compared to all experimental groups (P<0.01 as compared to autografts, P<0.0001 to allografts, and P<0.05 to SIEF and SIEF combined with differentiated MSCs, respectively). Volume and diameters of vessel segments in nerve allografts were enhanced by surgical angiogenesis. These distributions were further improved when surgical angiogenesis was combined with stem cells, with greatest increase found when combined with undifferentiated MSCs.

conclusionsThe interaction between vascularity and stem cells remains complex, however, this study provides some insight into its synergistic mechanisms. The combination of surgical angiogenesis with undifferentiated MSCs specifically, results in the greatest increase in revascularization, size of vessels, and stimulation of vessels to reach the middle longitudinal third of the nerve allograft.

Indexed as

Neovascularization, PhysiologicStem Cell TransplantationAllograftsAnimalsAutograftsCell DifferentiationMaleMicrocirculationModels, AnimalNerve RegenerationNerve TransferRatsRats, Inbred LewSciatic NerveSurgical FlapsX-Ray MicrotomographyDifferentiationNerve revascularizationPeripheral nerve repairProcessed nerve allograftStem cellsSurgical angiogenesis

Identifiers

PMID33436338
PMCPMC8222405
OpenAlexW3114430007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.