Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436134›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

Virtual nutrition consultation: what can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic?

Vered Kaufman-Shriqui, Shiri Sherf-Dagan, Mona Boaz, Ruth Birk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vered Kaufman-ShriquiDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, P.O. Box 3, Ariel, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-3190-4187
Shiri Sherf-DaganDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, P.O. Box 3, Ariel, Israel.
Mona BoazDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, P.O. Box 3, Ariel, Israel.
Ruth BirkDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Ariel University, P.O. Box 3, Ariel, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the extent, quality and challenges of dietetic counselling during the pandemic.

designA cross-sectional online thirty-six-item Google Survey. The survey queried demographics and information on usage and perceived telemedicine quality.

settingThe survey was distributed to Israeli Dietetic Association (ATID) mailing list between 31 March and 5 May 2020.

participantsClinical dietitians, members of ATID, who consented to participated in the survey.

resultsThree hundred dietitians (12 % of ATID members; 95 % women; mean age 4·41 (sd 10·2) years) replied to the survey. Most dietitians reported a significant ∼30 % decrease in work hours due to the pandemic. The most prevalent form of alternative nutrition counselling (ANC) was over the phone (72 %); 53·5 % used online platforms. Nearly 45 % had no former ANC experience. Both ANC formats were reported inferior to face-to-face nutritional consultation (consultation quality median scores 8 and 7, on a 1-10 scale, for online and phone, respectively). ANC difficulties on either phone or online platforms were technical (56 and 47 %, respectively), lack of anthropometric measurements (28 and 25 %, respectively) and interpersonal communication (19 and 14·6 %, respectively). Older age and former phone counselling experience were associated with higher quality scores, respectively (OR = 1·046, 95 % CI 1·01, 1·08, P = 0·005), (95 % CI 1·38, 4·52, P = 0·02). Those who continued to work full time had five-time greater odds for a higher quality score using online platforms (OR = 5·33, 95 % CI 1·091, 14·89, P = 0·001).

conclusionsOur findings suggest telemedicine holds considerable promise for dietary consultation; however, additional tools and training are needed to optimise remote ANC, especially in light of potential crisis-induced lockdown.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultCommunicable Disease ControlCross-Sectional StudiesDieteticsFemaleHumansIsraelMaleNutritionistsReferral and ConsultationSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineCoronavirusCOVID-19DietitiansNutritionNutrition surveyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33436134
PMCPMC7870906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.