Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436025›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Near-falls in Singapore community-dwelling older adults: a feasibility study.

Shawn Leng-Hsien Soh, Chee-Wee Tan, Judith Lane, Ting-Ting Yeh, Benjamin Soon

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04087551 (Incidence of Near-falls and the Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-efficacy Scale), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04087551 nacompletednot on this map

Incidence of Near-falls and the Development of the Balance Recovery Falls-efficacy Scale (BRFES) for the Community-dwelling Older Adults.

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Margaret UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled80ConditionsAccidental Fall, Aging, Self EfficacyArmsDeveloping the list of items for BRFES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of a short-form balance recovery confidence (SF-BRC) scale.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  2. Protective Factors for Falls Among Independent Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shawn Leng-Hsien SohSingapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Road, Singapore, 138683, Singapore. shawn.soh@singaporetech.edu.sg.
Chee-Wee TanGlasgow Caledonian University, Cowcaddens Rd, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK.
Judith LaneQueen Margaret University, Queen Margaret University Way, Musselburgh, EH21 6UU, UK.
Ting-Ting YehSingapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Road, Singapore, 138683, Singapore.
Benjamin SoonSingapore Institute of Technology, 10 Dover Road, Singapore, 138683, Singapore.

Funding

Singapore Institute of Technology R-MOE-E103-D018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA near-fall is defined as a loss of balance that would result in a fall if sufficient balance recovery manoeuvres are not executed. Compared to falls, near-falls and its associated balance recovery manoeuvres have been understudied. Older adults may not recognise a near-fall or identify the use of their balance recovery manoeuvres to prevent a fall. The consensus on the methods to collect near-fall data is lacking. The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of recruitment and retention. Secondary objectives were to establish evidence that Singapore community-dwelling older adults can identify near-falls and associated balance recovery manoeuvres. Texting and calling methods were explored as reporting methods.

methodsThis study took place in Singapore (September to October 2019). Participants were healthy, community-dwelling adults aged 65 or older. Recruitment was done through poster advertisement, and all participants gave informed consent. Participants attended a briefing session and reported their near-fall or fall incidence over 21 days using either daily texting or calling. The primary outcome measures were the recruitment rate, retention rate, preferred modes for data reporting and ability to report near-falls or falls. Secondary outcomes included the self-reported incidence of falls and near-falls.

resultsThirty older adults were recruited in 5 weeks. All participants completed the study. They understood near-fall concepts and were able to report the occurrence and relevant balance recovery manoeuvres used to prevent a fall. 87% (26/30) chose to text while 13% (4/30) selected calling as their reporting method. One actual fall (0.16%) out of 630 responses was reported. Thirty-six incidents (5.7%) of near-falls were recorded. Sixteen participants (53.3%) experienced near-falls and half of this group experienced two or more near-falls. The use of reach-to-grasp strategy (36%), compensatory stepping (52.8%), and other body regions (11.2%) were used to prevent the fall.

conclusionsThe study provided evidence that studying near-falls in Singapore community-dwelling older adults is feasible and can be applied to a large-scale study. Recruitment and retention rates were good. Older adults were able to identify near-falls and balance recovery manoeuvres. Both texting and calling were feasible reporting methods, but texting was preferred.

trial registrationClinicalTrials identifier: NCT04087551 . Registered on September 12, 2019.

Indexed as

Balance recoveryCommunity-dwellingGeriatricsNear-fallsOlder adults

Identifiers

PMID33436025
PMCPMC7802318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.