Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33436017›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2021

Prognosis analysis of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after surgical resection and the application of enucleation.

Junzhang Chen, Yongyu Yang, Yuanhua Liu, Heping Kan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Analysis of Complications Following Distal Resections for Neuroendocrine Tumors and Adenocarcinoma: Unveiling the Differences.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. A Machine Learning Approach Using [Molecular imaging and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Junzhang ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yongyu YangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yuanhua LiuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Heping KanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou North Ave, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China. gdw_nfyy123@163.com.
Nanfang Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs) after surgical resection, and to analyze the value of enucleation for pNETs without distant metastasis that are well-differentiated (G1) and have a diameter ≤ 4 cm.

methodsData from pNET patients undergoing surgical resection between 2004 and 2017 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing were used for the survival comparisons. Adjusted HRs with 95% CIs were calculated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models to estimate the prognostic factors. P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

resultsThis study found that female, cases diagnosed after 2010, and pancreatic body/tail tumors were protective factors for good survival, while histological grade G3, a larger tumor size, distant metastasis, AJCC 8th stage III-IV and age over 60 were independent prognostic factors for a worse OS/CSS. For the pNETs that were well-differentiated (G1) and had a tumor diameter ≤ 4 cm, the type of surgery was an independent factor for the long-term prognosis of this group. Compared with pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy, patients who were accepted enucleation had better OS/CSS.

conclusionFor pNETs patients undergoing surgical resection, sex, year of diagnosis, tumor location, pathological grade, tumor size, distant metastasis, race, and age were independent prognostic factors associated with the OS/CSS of patients. For pNETs patients with G1 and a tumor diameter less than 4 cm, if the tumor was located over 3 mm from the pancreatic duct, enucleation may be a wise choice.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPancreatectomyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateEnucleationPancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNETs)Prognostic factorSurgical resectionSurveillance, epidemiology, end results (SEER) database

Identifiers

PMID33436017
PMCPMC7805225
OpenAlexW3121071854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.