Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435945›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

Comparison of three treatment methods for simple bone cyst in children.

Ke-Xue Zhang, Wei Chai, Jia-Jia Zhao, Jun-Hao Deng, Zhan Peng, Ji-Ying Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What's new in musculoskeletal oncology.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ke-Xue ZhangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China.
Wei ChaiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Jia-Jia ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shun Yi District Hospital, Beijing, 101300, China.
Jun-Hao DengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Zhan PengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
Ji-Ying ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China. 15110245907@163.com.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNShunyi Hospital of Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

grants of Foundation and Strengthening Program in Technical Area 2019-JCJQ-JJ-149Military Medical and Health Achievement Fund 19WKS09Military Medicine Youth Fund of PLA General Hospital QNF19056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe unicameral bone cyst (UBC) is a kind of benign tumor whose clinical treatments and efficacy are controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN), the injection of autologous bone marrow (ABM), and the combination of ESIN and ABM in the treatment of bone cyst in children.

methodsEighty-three cases with simple bone cyst were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-eight cases were treated with ABM. Twenty-eight cases were treated with ESIN. Twenty-seven cases were treated with ABM and ESIN. All cases were diagnosed through X-ray, CT, or MRI scans. For the suspicious ones, the pathological biopsy was performed for an accurate diagnosis. X-ray examinations were carried out for the postoperative follow-up. Capanna criteria for bone cyst was used for postoperative evaluation of three methods.

resultsAll cases accomplished the follow-up. The effective rate of the ABM + ESIN group was significantly higher than that of the ABM group (P < 0.05), and the cure rates of the ESIN group and the ABM + ESIN group were higher than that of the ABM group (P < 0.05, respectively). The cure time in the ESIN group was lower than that of the other two groups (P < 0.05, respectively). The times for admission were 2.0 ± 0.0 in the ESIN group, 5.7 ± 1.9 in the ABM group, and 4.7 ± 2.4 in the ABM + ESIN group (P < 0.05 when compared with each other).

conclusionsThe method of ABM combined with ESIN for children's bone cyst has the highest effective rate and curative rate. For the individual method, ESIN has a higher effective rate and curative rate than that of ABM. Meanwhile, it has the fewest time of hospitalization.

Indexed as

Bone CystsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryBone NailsChildFracture HealingHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAutologous bone marrowBone cystChildElastic stable intramedullary nail

Identifiers

PMID33435945
PMCPMC7805037
OpenAlexW3120091187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.