Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435941›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2021

A cluster-randomized trial of workplace ergonomics and neck-specific exercise versus ergonomics and health promotion for office workers to manage neck pain - a secondary outcome analysis.

Venerina Johnston, Xiaoqi Chen, Alyssa Welch, Gisela Sjøgaard, Tracy A Comans, Megan McStea, Leon Straker, Markus Melloh, Michelle Pereira, Shaun O'Leary

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Active break program: an evidence- based review for the promotion of occupational health.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMT
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Venerina JohnstonThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4067, Australia. v.johnston@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0911-0866
Xiaoqi ChenThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4067, Australia.
Alyssa WelchThe University of Queensland, Centre for Health Services Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Gisela SjøgaardUniversity of Southern Denmark, Department of Sport Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Odense, Denmark.
Tracy A ComansThe University of Queensland, Centre for Health Services Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Megan McSteaThe University of Queensland, Centre for Health Services Research, Brisbane, Australia.
Leon StrakerCurtin University, School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Perth, Australia.
Markus MellohZurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Michelle PereiraThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4067, Australia.
Shaun O'LearyThe University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, St Lucia, Brisbane, Queensland, 4067, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUCurtin University · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1042508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeck pain is prevalent among office workers. This study evaluated the impact of an ergonomic and exercise training (EET) intervention and an ergonomic and health promotion (EHP) intervention on neck pain intensity among the All Workers and a subgroup of Neck Pain cases at baseline.

methodsA 12-month cluster-randomized trial was conducted in 14 public and private organisations. Office workers aged ≥18 years working ≥30 h per week (n = 740) received an individualised workstation ergonomic intervention, followed by 1:1 allocation to the EET group (neck-specific exercise training), or the EHP group (health promotion) for 12 weeks. Neck pain intensity (scale: 0-9) was recorded at baseline, 12 weeks, and 12 months. Participants with data at these three time points were included for analysis (n = 367). Intervention group differences were analysed using generalized estimating equation models on an intention-to-treat basis and adjusted for potential confounders. Subgroup analysis was performed on neck cases reporting pain ≥3 at baseline (n = 96).

resultsThe EET group demonstrated significantly greater reductions in neck pain intensity at 12 weeks compared to the EHP group for All Workers (EET: β = - 0.53 points 95% CI: - 0.84- - 0.22 [36%] and EHP: β = - 0.17 points 95% CI: - 0.47-0.13 [10.5%], p-value = 0.02) and the Neck Cases (EET: β = - 2.32 points 95% CI: - 3.09- - 1.56 [53%] and EHP: β = - 1.75 points 95% CI: - 2.35- - 1.16 [36%], p = 0.04). Reductions in pain intensity were not maintained at 12 months with no between-group differences observed in All Workers (EET: β = - 0.18, 95% CI: - 0.53-0.16 and EHP: β = - 0.14 points 95% CI: - 0.49-0.21, p = 0.53) or Neck Cases, although in both groups an overall reduction was found (EET: β = - 1.61 points 95% CI: - 2.36- - 0.89 and EHP: β = - 1.9 points 95% CI: - 2.59- - 1.20, p = 0.26).

conclusionEET was more effective than EHP in reducing neck pain intensity in All Workers and Neck Cases immediately following the intervention period (12 weeks) but not at 12 months, with changes at 12 weeks reaching clinically meaningful thresholds for the Neck Cases. Findings suggest the need for continuation of exercise to maintain benefits in the longer term. CLINICAL

trial registrationhACTRN12612001154897 Date of Registration: 31/10/2012.

Indexed as

Neck PainWorkplaceAdolescentAdultErgonomicsExercise TherapyHealth PromotionHumansErgonomicsExerciseHealth promotionNeck painWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID33435941
PMCPMC7805092
OpenAlexW3117971657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.