Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435903›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2021

What is stopping us? An implementation science study of kangaroo care in British Columbia's neonatal intensive care units.

Sarah Coutts, Alix Woldring, Ann Pederson, Julie De Salaberry, Horacio Osiovich, Lori A Brotto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Surrogate skin-to-skin care: the "donor milk" of kangaroo mother care.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah CouttsPerinatal Services BC, 260 - 1770 W 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6J 4Y6, Canada. scoutts-02@phsa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4089-4371
Alix WoldringPerinatal Services BC, 260 - 1770 W 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6J 4Y6, Canada.
Ann PedersonPerinatal Services BC, 260 - 1770 W 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6J 4Y6, Canada.
Julie De SalaberryBC Women's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Horacio OsiovichBC Women's Hospital, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
Lori A BrottoWomen's Health Research Institute, H214 - 4500 Oak Street, Box 42B, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CAPositive Living Society of British Columbia · CAB.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe goal of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) is to provide optimal care for preterm and sick infants while supporting their growth and development. The NICU environment can be stressful for preterm infants and often cannot adequately support their neurodevelopmental needs. Kangaroo Care (KC) is an evidence-based developmental care strategy that has been shown to be associated with improved short and long term neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm infants. Despite evidence for best practice, uptake of the practice of KC in resource supported settings remains low. The aim of this study was to identify and describe healthcare providers' perspectives on the barriers and enablers of implementing KC.

methodsThis qualitative study was set in 11 NICUs in British Columbia, Canada, ranging in size from 6 to 70 beds, with mixed levels of care from the less acute up to the most complex acute neonatal care. A total of 35 semi-structured healthcare provider interviews were conducted to understand their experiences providing KC in the NICU. Data were coded and emerging themes were identified. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided our research methods.

resultsFour overarching themes were identified as barriers and enablers to KC by healthcare providers in their particular setting: 1) the NICU physical environment; 2) healthcare provider beliefs about KC; 3) clinical practice variation; and 4) parent presence. Depending on the specific features of a given site these factors functioned as an enabler or barrier to practicing KC.

conclusionsA 'one size fits all' approach cannot be identified to guide Kangaroo Care implementation as it is a complex intervention and each NICU presents unique barriers and enablers to its uptake. Support for improving parental presence, shifting healthcare provider beliefs, identifying creative solutions to NICU design and space constraints, and the development of a provincial guideline for KC in NICUs may together provide the impetus to change practice and reduce barriers to KC for healthcare providers, families, and administrators at local and system levels.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelIntensive Care Units, NeonatalKangaroo-Mother Care MethodBritish ColumbiaFemaleHumansImplementation ScienceInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicPregnancyCanadaFamily-centered careImplementation scienceKangaroo careKangaroo mother careNeonatal intensive care unitNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID33435903
PMCPMC7805090
OpenAlexW3120494082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.