Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435457›Full record

ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Comparative Analysis of Stress in the Periodontal Ligament and Center of Rotation in the Tooth after Orthodontic Treatment Depending on Clear Aligner Thickness-Finite Element Analysis Study.

Jeong-Hee Seo, Emmanuel Eghan-Acquah, Min-Seok Kim, Jeong-Hyeon Lee, Yong-Hoon Jeong, Tae-Gon Jung, Mihee Hong, Won-Hyeon Kim, Bongju Kim, Sung-Jae Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. A Novel Double Arrowhead Auxetic Dental Splint for Avulsed Tooth Reimplantation.Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeong-Hee SeoMedical Device R&D Center, DENTIS Co., Ltd., Daegu 41065, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6702-1960
Emmanuel Eghan-AcquahDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0011-6981
Min-Seok KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Jeong-Hyeon LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Yong-Hoon JeongOsong Medical Innovation Foundation, Osong 28160, Korea.
Tae-Gon JungOsong Medical Innovation Foundation, Osong 28160, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4793-9125
Mihee HongDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu 41940, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-1482
Won-Hyeon KimInnovative Research & Support Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9742-7945
Bongju KimInnovative Research & Support Center for Dental Science, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7309-5977
Sung-Jae LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.

Funding

Research Year of the Inje University in 2016 20160551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lately, in orthodontic treatments, the use of transparent aligners for the correction of malocclusions has become prominent owing to their intrinsic advantages such as esthetics, comfort, and minimal maintenance. Attempts at improving upon this technology by varying various parameters to investigate the effects on treatments have been carried out by several researchers. Here, we aimed to investigate the biomechanical and clinical effects of aligner thickness on stress distributions in the periodontal ligament and changes in the tooth's center of rotation. Dental finite element models comprising the cortical and cancellous bones, gingiva, teeth, and nonlinear viscoelastic periodontal ligaments were constructed, validated, and used together with aligner finite element models of different aligner thicknesses to achieve the goal of this study. The finite element analyses were conducted to simulate the actual orthodontic aligner treatment process for the correction of malocclusions by generating pre-stresses in the aligner and allowing the aligner stresses to relax to induce tooth movement. The results of the analyses showed that orthodontic treatment in lingual inclination and axial rotation with a 0.75 mm-thick aligner resulted in 6% and 0.03% higher principal stresses in the periodontal ligament than the same treatment using a 0.05 mm-thick aligner, respectively. Again, for both aligner thicknesses, the tooth's center of rotation moved lingually and towards the root direction in lingual inclination, and diagonally from the long axis of the tooth in axial rotation. Taken together, orthodontic treatment for simple malocclusions using transparent aligners of different thicknesses will produce a similar effect on the principal stresses in the periodontal ligament and similar changes in the tooth's center of rotation, as well as sufficient tooth movement. These findings provide orthodontists and researchers clinical and biomechanical evidence about the effect of transparent aligner thickness selection and its effect on orthodontic treatment.

Indexed as

aligner thicknesscenter of rotationclear alignerfinite element analysisprincipal stress

Identifiers

PMID33435457
PMCPMC7826543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.