Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33435260›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Modifications on the Tetrahydroquinoline Scaffold Targeting a Phenylalanine Cluster on GPER as Antiproliferative Compounds against Renal, Liver and Pancreatic Cancer Cells.

David Méndez-Luna, Loreley Araceli Morelos-Garnica, Juan Benjamín García-Vázquez, Martiniano Bello, Itzia Irene Padilla-Martínez, Manuel Jonathan Fragoso-Vázquez, Alfonso Dueñas González, Nuria De Pedro, José Antonio Gómez-Vidal, Humberto Lubriel Mendoza-Figueroa and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Special Issue "GPCRs: Ligands and beyond 2022".Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

David Méndez-LunaLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-7916
Loreley Araceli Morelos-GarnicaLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.
Juan Benjamín García-VázquezLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-1930-5288
Martiniano BelloLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-0755
Itzia Irene Padilla-MartínezLaboratorio de Química Supramolecular y Nanociencias, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Acueducto s/n., Barrio La Laguna Ticomán, Ciudad de México 07340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-2049
Manuel Jonathan Fragoso-VázquezDepartamento de Química Orgánica, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional Prolongación de Carpio y Plan de Ayala S/N. Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4730-8921
Alfonso Dueñas GonzálezGenomic Medicine and Environmental Toxicology, Biomedical Research Institute, UNAM, National Cancer Institute, Av San Fernando 22, Tlalpan, Mexico City 14080, Mexico.
Nuria De PedroFundación MEDINA, Parque Tecnológico Ciencias de la Salud, Avenida del Conocimiento 34, 18016 Granada, Spain.
José Antonio Gómez-VidalFacultad de Farmacia, Departamento de Química Farmacéutica y Orgánica, Universidad de Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Humberto Lubriel Mendoza-FigueroaLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1356-4281
José Correa-BasurtoLaboratorio de Diseño y Desarrollo de Nuevos Fármacos e Innovación Biotecnológica (Laboratory for the Design and Development of New Drugs and Biotechnological Innovation), Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis y Díaz Mirón, s/n, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4973-5265

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CB-254600, APN-782
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of chemo- and bioinformatics tools is a crucial step in the design of structure-based drugs, enabling the identification of more specific and effective molecules against cancer without side effects. In this study, three new compounds were designed and synthesized with suitable absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADME-tox) properties and high affinity for the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) binding site by in silico methods, which correlated with the growth inhibitory activity tested in a cluster of cancer cell lines. Docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations accompanied by a molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area (MMGBSA) approach yielded the binding modes and energetic features of the proposed compounds on GPER. These in silico studies showed that the compounds reached the GPER binding site, establishing interactions with a phenylalanine cluster (F206, F208 and F278) required for GPER molecular recognition of its agonist and antagonist ligands. Finally, a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay showed growth inhibitory activity of compounds

Indexed as

antiproliferativedockingGPERmolecular dynamics simulationsSuzuki–Miyaura cross-couplingtetrahydroquinoline scaffold

Identifiers

PMID33435260
PMCPMC7826836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.