ArticleBiomaterials2021
Rheological characterization, compression, and injection molding of hydroxyapatite-silk fibroin composites.
Article in Biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent advances in biomaterials for bone regeneration: Bridging innovation and clinical translation.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Autofluorescence lifetime of gelatin-methacrylate hydrogels is sensitive to changes in crosslinking and post-gelation pH.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Synthetic Calcium-Phosphate Materials for Bone Grafting.Polymers · 2023Review
- Sequential gastrodin release PU/n-HA composite scaffolds reprogram macrophages for improved osteogenesis and angiogenesis.Bioactive materials · 2023Article
- A Review of Recent Advances in Natural Polymer-Based Scaffolds for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2022Review
- Curcuminoid-Tailored Interfacial Free Energy of Hydrophobic Fibers for Enhanced Biological Properties.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional bone fixation devices made from inert metal alloys provide structural strength for bone repair but are limited in their ability to actively promote bone healing. Although several naturally derived bioactive materials have been developed to promote ossification in bone defects, it is difficult to translate small-scale benchtop fabrication of these materials to high-output manufacturing. Standard industrial molding processes, such as injection and compression molding, have typically been limited to use with synthetic polymers since most biopolymers cannot withstand the harsh processing conditions involved in these techniques. Here we demonstrate injection and compression molding of a bioceramic composite comprised of hydroxyapatite (HA) and silk fibroin (SF) from Bombyx mori silkworm cocoons. Both the molding behavior of the HA-SF slurry and final scaffold mechanics can be controlled by modulating SF protein molecular weight, SF content, and powder-to-liquid ratio. HA-SF composites with up to 20 weight percent SF were successfully molded into stable three-dimensional structures using high pressure molding techniques. The unique durability of silk fibroin enables application of common molding techniques to fabricate composite silk-ceramic scaffolds. This work demonstrates the potential to move bone tissue engineering one step closer to large-scale manufacturing of natural protein-based resorbable bone grafts and fixation devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.