Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33434457›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

The evolution of patterning during movement in a large-scale citizen science game.

Anna E Hughes, David Griffiths, Jolyon Troscianko, Laura A Kelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna E HughesDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Wivenhoe House, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
David GriffithsFoAM Kernow, Penryn TR10 8AE, UK.
Jolyon TrosciankoCentre for Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
Laura A KelleyCentre for Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F016581/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motion dazzle hypothesis posits that high contrast geometric patterns can cause difficulties in tracking a moving target and has been argued to explain the patterning of animals such as zebras. Research to date has only tested a small number of patterns, offering equivocal support for the hypothesis. Here, we take a genetic programming approach to allow patterns to evolve based on their fitness (time taken to capture) and thus find the optimal strategy for providing protection when moving. Our 'Dazzle Bug' citizen science game tested over 1.5 million targets in a touch screen game at a popular visitor attraction. Surprisingly, we found that targets lost pattern elements during evolution and became closely background matching. Modelling results suggested that targets with lower motion energy were harder to catch. Our results indicate that low contrast, featureless targets offer the greatest protection against capture when in motion, challenging the motion dazzle hypothesis.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceMotion PerceptionAnimalsMotionMovementcitizen scienceevolutiongenetic algorithmsmotion dazzlemotion perception

Identifiers

PMID33434457
PMCPMC7892415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.