Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33434401›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

Development of a novel gout treatment patient decision aid by patient and physician: A qualitative research study.

Meykkumar Meyappan, Wei Siong Aaron Loh, Li Yen Tan, Sheng Feng Ian Tan, Pey Ying Ho, Yih Jia Poh, Ngiap Chuan Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Development of a novel gout treatment patient decision aid by patient and physician: A qualitative research study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meykkumar MeyappanSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore City, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-4455-4318
Wei Siong Aaron LohYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore.
Li Yen TanSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore City, Singapore.
Sheng Feng Ian TanSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore City, Singapore.
Pey Ying HoSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore City, Singapore.
Yih Jia PohRheumatology Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore City, Singapore.
Ngiap Chuan TanSingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore City, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-5946-1149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGout treatment is not optimized globally, often due to therapeutic inertia by physicians or poor adherence to urate-lowering medications by patients. A patient decision aid (PDA) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) in gout treatment may overcome these physician-patient barriers.

objectiveThe study explored the views of physicians and patients on a novel locally designed gout treatment PDA prototype.

designQualitative descriptive design was used to gather data from in-depth-interviews (IDI) and focus group discussions (FGD). Data analysis was via thematic analysis. Emergent themes shaped a revised version of the PDA. SETTING AND

participantsAdult Asian patients with recent acute gout exacerbations and local Primary Care Physicians (PCP) in Singapore were purposefully chosen. 15 patients with gout and 11 PCPs participated across three IDIs and six FGDs, with the investigators exploring their views of a prototype gout treatment PDA.

resultsPatients and physicians generally concurred with the content and design of the PDA prototype. However, while patients preferred fewer treatment details, the PCPs desired more information. Patients preferred the display of statistics, while PCPs felt that numbers were not relevant to patients. The latter were hesitant to include treatment options that were unavailable in primary care. Both stakeholders indicated that they would use the PDA during a consultation. PCPs would need further training in SDM, given a lack of understanding of it. CONCLUSION AND PATIENT CONTRIBUTION: Patients will be the prime users of the PDA. While their views differed partially from the physicians, both have jointly developed the novel gout treatment PDA.

Indexed as

GoutPhysicians, Primary CareAdultDecision MakingDecision Support TechniquesFocus GroupsHumansPatient ParticipationQualitative Researchgoutpatientpatient decision aidphysicianshared decision makingtreatment

Identifiers

PMID33434401
PMCPMC8077153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.