Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33434388›Full record

ArticleNursing open2021

Nurse practitioner work patterns: A cross-sectional study.

Grainne Lowe, Kathleen Tori, Natasha Jennings, Dan Schiftan, Andrea Driscoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grainne LoweSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1545-3187
Kathleen ToriUniversity of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS, Australia.
Natasha JenningsNurse Practitioner Locum Solutions, Little River, Vic., Australia.
Dan SchiftanDepartment of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Andrea DriscollSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim was to determine how nurse practitioner (NP) roles are translated into clinical practice across Victoria, Australia. This paper reports details about NP work patterns and scopes of practice across multiple clinical settings and geographic locations.

designA quantitative survey design was used. A data abstraction tool, based on previous work, was adapted for this study.

methodsAll NPs in one state of Australia were eligible to participate in the study and invited to complete an online survey about their NP practice. A previously developed data collection tool, capturing practice patterns of NPs, was adapted for online use in REDCAP. The data were exported, and descriptive statistics were analysed using SPSS.

resultsParticipants were mostly female, with males accounting for 25%. Findings indicate several NPs working in outpatient settings, community settings and forensic care. Patterns of practice-prescribing and ordering diagnostics-are associated with clinical context and model of care of the NP work.

Indexed as

Nurse PractitionersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoriaclinical practicediagnostic techniques and proceduresnurse practitionersreferral patternstherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33434388
PMCPMC7877128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.