ArticlePloS one2021
Hydrodynamic stress maps on the surface of a flexible fin-like foil.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We determine the time dependence of pressure and shear stress distributions on the surface of a pitching and deforming hydrofoil from measurements of the three dimensional flow field. Period-averaged stress maps are obtained both in the presence and absence of steady flow around the foil. The velocity vector field is determined via volumetric three-component particle tracking velocimetry and subsequently inserted into the Navier-Stokes equation to calculate the total hydrodynamic stress tensor. In addition, we also present a careful error analysis of such measurements, showing that local evaluations of stress distributions are possible. The consistency of the force time-dependence is verified using a control volume analysis. The flapping foil used in the experiments is designed to allow comparison with a small trapezoidal fish fin, in terms of the scaling laws that govern the oscillatory flow regime. As a complementary approach, unsteady Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is employed to derive instantaneous transversal force distributions on the flexible hydrofoil from its deflection and the results are compared to the spatial distributions of hydrodynamic stresses obtained from the fluid velocity field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.