Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433836›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2021

Trends of incidence, mortality and survival of multiple myeloma in Spain. A twenty-three-year population-based study.

D-Y-L Chang-Chan, R Ríos-Tamayo, M Rodríguez Barranco, D Redondo-Sánchez, Y González, R Marcos-Gragera, M J Sánchez

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Multiple myeloma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Impact of Panobinostat on Cell Death in Combination with S63845 in Multiple Myeloma Cells.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D-Y-L Chang-ChanGranada Cancer Registry, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain.
R Ríos-TamayoMonoclonal Gammopathies Clinical Trials Unit, Department of Hematology, University Hospital Virgen de Las Nieves, Granada, Spain. rriost33@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8193-1402
M Rodríguez BarrancoGranada Cancer Registry, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain.
D Redondo-SánchezGranada Cancer Registry, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain.
Y GonzálezDepartment of Hematology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain.
R Marcos-GrageraCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red: Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
M J SánchezGranada Cancer Registry, Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite major advances, multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease. Epidemiological data from high-quality population-based registries are needed to understand the heterogeneous landscape of the disease.

methodsIncidence, mortality and survival in multiple myeloma were comprehensively analyzed in the Girona and Granada population-based cancer registries, over a 23-year study (1994-2016), divided into three periods (1994-2001, 2002-2009 and 2010-2016). Joinpoint regression analysis was used to estimate the annual percentage change in incidence and mortality. Age-standardized net survival was calculated with the Pohar-Perme method.

results1957 myeloma patients were included in the study, with a median age of 72 years. Age-standardized incidence and mortality rates decreased over time in both sexes and both rates were higher in males. Five-year age-standardized net survival by period was 27.4% (1994-2001), 38.8% (2002-2009), and 47.4% (2010-2016). Survival improved for all age groups: 32.4%, 74.1% and 78.5% for patients aged 15-49; 27.5%, 44.6%, and 58.5% for those aged 50-69; finally, 24.8%, 25.5%, and 26.3% for the older group.

conclusionIncidence remained overall stable throughout the study, with only a small increase for men. Mortality was progressively decreasing in both sexes. Both incidence and mortality were higher in men. Age plays a critical role in survival, with impressive improvement in patients younger than 70 years, but only a minor benefit in those older than 70.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaSpainSurvival RateTime FactorsYoung AdultIncidenceMortalityMultiple myelomaPopulation-based registrySurvival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.