Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433817›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2021

Latency Reversal 2.0: Giving the Immune System a Seat at the Table.

Vidisha Singh, Amir Dashti, Maud Mavigner, Ann Chahroudi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Latency Reversing Agents and the Road to an HIV CurePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vidisha SinghDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Amir DashtiDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maud MavignerDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ann ChahroudiDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA. ann.m.chahroudi@emory.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7479-9546
Emory University · US

Funding

B and T Cell Biology of Protection from and Eradication of SIV/SHIV Infection - Administrative SupplementUM1AI124436 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AMARA, RAMA RAO, HUNTER, ERIC · 2016 to 2021
$42.3M
Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE)UM1AI126619 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MARGOLIS, DAVID M. · 2016 to 2020
$23.2M
Antiviral role of CD8+ T cells in ART-treated SIV-infected macaquesR01AI125064 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SILVESTRI, GUIDO · 2016 to 2025
$8.7M
Immune interventions in SIV-infected ART-suppressed infant macaquesR01AI133706 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHAHROUDI, ANN M · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI125064NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI133706NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI124436NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI126619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFor most people living with HIV (PLWH), treatment with effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) results in suppression of viremia below the limit of detection of clinical assays, immune reconstitution, reduced immune activation, avoidance of opportunistic infections, and progression to AIDS. However, ART alone is not curative, and HIV persists in a non-replicating, latent form. In this review, we provide a historical perspective on non-specific latency reversal approaches (LRA 1.0) and summarize recent advances in latency reversal strategies that target specific signaling pathways within CD4+ T cells or other immune cells to induce expression of latent HIV (immune-based latency reversal, or LRA 2.0). RECENT

findingsThe HIV reservoir is primarily composed of latently infected CD4+ T cells carrying integrated, replication-competent provirus that can give rise to rebound viremia if ART is stopped. Myeloid lineage cells also contribute to HIV latency in certain tissues; we focus here on CD4+ T cells as a sufficient body of evidence regarding latency reversal in myeloid cells is lacking. The immunomodulatory LRA 2.0 approaches we describe include pattern recognition receptor agonists, immune checkpoint inhibitors, non-canonical NF-kB stimulation, and transient CD8+ lymphocyte depletion, along with promising combination strategies. We highlight recent studies demonstrating robust latency reversal in nonhuman primate models. While significant strides have been made in terms of virus reactivation from latency, initial hopes for latency reversal alone to result in a reduction of infected cells, through viral cytopathic effect or an unboosted immune system, have not been realized and it seems clear that even effective latency reversal strategies will need to be paired with an approach that facilitates immune recognition and clearance of cells containing reactivated virus.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV InfectionsAnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesHumansViremiaVirus ActivationVirus LatencyCD8 depletionHIV-1 cureImmune-based therapeuticsLatency reversal agentsShock and killSMAC

Identifiers

PMID33433817
PMCPMC7985101
OpenAlexW3120610184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.