Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433812›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2021

Liver Biopsy in Pregnancy: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature.

Kemmian D Johnson, Abhilash Perisetti, Hemant Goyal, Ragesh Thandassery, Mahesh Gajendran, Mohammad Aziz, Benjamin Tharian, Sumant Inamdar

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kemmian D JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Abhilash PerisettiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Hemant GoyalThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, 501 S. Washington Avenue, Scranton, PA, 18503, USA. goyalh@thewrightcenter.org.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-9042
Ragesh ThandasseryGastroenterology/Hepatology Staff Physician and Liver Program Director, VISN-16 MD Lead for Advanced Liver Disease, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Mahesh GajendranPaul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, 5001 El Paso Drive, El Paso, TX, 79905, USA.
Mohammad AzizDepartment of Gastroenterology, University of Toledo, 3000 Arlington Ave, Mail Stop 1150, Toledo, OH, 43614, USA.
Benjamin TharianDirector of General and Advanced Endoscopy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Sumant InamdarProgram Director- Advanced Endoscopy Fellowship, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USTexas Tech University · USThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education · USUniversity of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The etiology of most cases of liver diseases in pregnancy can be diagnosed with a thorough history, physical examination, laboratory values, serology, and noninvasive imaging. However, atypical clinical and laboratory presentations of liver diseases/chemistries require a liver biopsy to render an accurate diagnosis in cases where the biopsy results affect the timing of delivery or impact choice of medical therapy. According to the American College of Gastroenterology, liver biopsy can be effectively and safely conducted in pregnant women. Conventional routes of performing a liver biopsy include the percutaneous, transjugular route, and surgical methods. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is a recent technique that has not yet gained widespread adoption but can potentially serve as an alternative route for obtaining the liver sample. Adverse events associated with liver biopsy include abdominal pain and hemorrhage. Maternal and fetal outcomes are limited to increased risk of preterm birth and small for gestational age neonate. However, very few studies have formally evaluated the safety of liver biopsy in pregnant women. In this review, we present two successful cases of liver biopsy performed during pregnancy and summarize the most recent evidence regarding the safety and outcomes of the procedure in pregnancy to assist clinicians in their decision to perform a liver biopsy during pregnancy or postpone it until after delivery.

Indexed as

AdultBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleCholestasis, IntrahepaticFatty LiverFemaleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyLaparoscopyLiverPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk AssessmentUltrasonographyYoung AdultAcute fatty liver of pregnancyIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancyLiver biopsyLiver function testPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33433812
OpenAlexW3119504326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.