Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433726›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2021

An Innovative National Programme for Comprehensive Chronic Wound Therapy and Its Impact on Treatment Outcomes.

Kryspin Mitura

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kryspin MituraFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Siedlce, Poland. chirurgia.siedlce@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2227-4550
University of Siedlce · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the lifetime prevalence of chronic ulcers tends to be approximately 2.2-10 per 1000 population, no systemic solutions for this problem have been implemented in many countries. It is still not fully agreed whether treatment of chronic wounds requires hospitalization, which incurs high costs, or whether the therapy can be carried out entirely in an outpatient setting. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the 5-year activity and effectiveness of a national programme for the comprehensive treatment of chronic wounds based on hybrid care for patients. Treatment of nonhealing chronic wounds begins in the hospital, where necessary diagnostic actions are carried out, followed by surgical cleansing of the wound and selection of appropriate dressings. Then, the treatment is continued in the outpatient setting with a continuous patient education. The programme is divided into four subsequent stages. In addition, the present study compared the effectiveness of chronic wound treatment with that in the period before implementation of the programme.

methodsFrom January 2015 to December 2019, 383 patients were treated at a centre for chronic wounds. We analysed the outcomes in 227 individuals with chronic venous ulceration or diabetic foot syndrome.

resultsThe mean wound area at the time of introduction of treatment was 36 cm2 (1-290; SD 34). After three stages of treatment, wounds were completely healed in 139 patients (61.2%), 78 patients with venous ulcers (55.3%) and 61 patients with diabetic foot (70.9%). In an additional 67 cases (29.5%), a significant reduction in wound area and depth was achieved, and the treatment was continued beyond the actual treatment programme. No significant effect was achieved in 21 patients (9.2%). In the group of patients treated without systematic application of the guidelines of the programme, wound healing occurred only in 19 cases (26.8%), reduction in the wound area occurred in 27 patients (38.0%), and lack of any healing progress or even worsening of the wound status was found in the remaining 25 cases (35.2%); these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

conclusionTreatment of chronic wounds based on a systematic dedicated programme using an experienced multidisciplinary team of professionals allows to obtain better results in terms of reduction in wound area and might be an effective procedure. The combination of frequent, scheduled outpatient visits, access to inpatient treatment, and regular education of patients based on a standard form improves treatment outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetic FootVaricose UlcerBandagesHumansTreatment OutcomeWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID33433726
OpenAlexW3120529820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.