Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433716›Full record

SynthesisArchives of dermatological research2021

Rejuvenating the periorbital area using platelet-rich plasma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adam G Evans, Mirjana G Ivanic, Mina A Botros, Rand W Pope, Briana R Halle, Gabriella E Glassman, Rafaella Genova, Salam Al Kassis

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of dermatological research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06281483 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Platelet-rich Fibrin Versus Conventional Treatment in Chronic Non-healing Skin Ulcers: a Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorKafrelsheikh UniversityRan2024 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsChronic Non-healing Skin UlcersArmsplatelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, Surgical debridement, normal saline washing and dressing coverage
NCT06452667 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Platelet Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet Rich Plasma for Microneedling Treatment of Facial Photoaging-a Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsPhotoagingArmsplatelet-rich fibin, platelet-rich palsma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. The investigation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of stromal vascular fraction (SVF), platelet rich plasma (PRP), and 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in reducing nanofat treated infraorbital dark circles and wrinkles: A controlled blinded randomized clinical trial.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Periorbital rejuvenation in the clinic: A state-of-the-art review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Review
  15. [Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA): a review of the current literature].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Adam G EvansMeharry Medical College, 1005 Dr DB Todd Jr Blvd, Nashville, TN, 37208, USA. aevans17@email.mmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8535-7583
Mirjana G IvanicMeharry Medical College, 1005 Dr DB Todd Jr Blvd, Nashville, TN, 37208, USA.
Mina A BotrosMeharry Medical College, 1005 Dr DB Todd Jr Blvd, Nashville, TN, 37208, USA.
Rand W PopeVanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Briana R HalleVanderbilt University School of Medicine, 1161 21st Ave South, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Gabriella E GlassmanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, D-4207 Medical Center North, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Rafaella GenovaUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center, 910 Madison Ave, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA.
Salam Al KassisDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, D-4207 Medical Center North, 1211 Medical Center Drive, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
Meharry Medical College · USVanderbilt University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intradermal injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a non-surgical cosmetic therapy to rejuvenate the periorbital area pathologies of wrinkles, periorbital hyperpigmentation (POH), and photoaging. The past decade has seen the adoption of this novel therapy around the world. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating PRP treatment of periorbital pathologies. This is a PRISMA compliant review that includes a comprehensive search of the databases Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov. The search was performed in June 2019 to obtain all peer-reviewed articles published in English that describe the application of PRP to periorbital pathologies. A meta-analysis of patient satisfaction was performed for randomized controlled trials. Nineteen studies treating 455 patients (95% female, age range 28-60) were included. Studies were categorized based on reported outcomes: wrinkles (11 studies), POH (7 studies), and photoaging (6 studies). Patients were treated a mean of 3 times (range 1-8) in mean intervals of 23 days (range 14-56 days). Follow-up averaged 3 months (range 1-6 months). Meta-analysis of 3 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) shows that patients treated with PRP have increased satisfaction above controls of saline, platelet-poor plasma, mesotherapy, and as an adjunct to laser therapy (overall effect p = 0.001, heterogeneity I

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesRejuvenationBlood Transfusion, AutologousFaceHumansInjections, IntradermalPatient SatisfactionPlatelet-Rich PlasmaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin AgingTreatment OutcomePeriorbital hyperpigmentationPhotoagingPlatelet-rich fibrinPlate-rich plasmaSkin agingWrinkles

Identifiers

PMID33433716
OpenAlexW3120046582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.