Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433700›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2021

Marijuana and Bariatric Surgery.

Allyson Diggins, Leslie Heinberg

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allyson DigginsCleveland Clinic Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. diggina@ccf.org.
Leslie HeinbergCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Bariatric & Metabolic Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMarijuana use presents a unique challenge to bariatric surgery programs. We review the recent evidence examining marijuana use on outcomes following bariatric surgery. RECENT

findingsRecent studies have not demonstrated an increased risk of short-term surgical complications or differences in up to 2-year weight loss following surgery among marijuana users. However, studies have demonstrated increased risks in two areas: pain management and problematic eating behaviors. Additionally, preoperative marijuana use has been linked to increased postoperative marijuana use which may undermine weight loss and increase risk for weight regain. There are still many unanswered questions regarding marijuana use and bariatric surgery, and the limited literature base has produced mixed results when considering marijuana as a contraindication for bariatric surgery. Programs must take into consideration the laws of their state, individual patterns of use, and route of administration when considering whether marijuana is a contraindication for surgery.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryCannabisObesity, MorbidFeeding BehaviorHumansWeight LossBariatric surgeryMarijuanaPostoperative outcomesSevere obesitySubstance use

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.