Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433676›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy.

Kamal K Mahawar, Islam Omar, Rishi Singhal, Sandeep Aggarwal, Mustafa Ismail Allouch, Salman K Alsabah, Luigi Angrisani, Faruq Mohamed Badiuddin, Jose María Balibrea, Ahmad Bashir and 44 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

54 authors.

Kamal K MahawarBariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK. kmahawar@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2551-3462
Islam OmarBariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Rishi SinghalBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Sandeep AggarwalAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, India.
Mustafa Ismail AllouchNini Hospital, Tripoli, Lebanon.
Salman K AlsabahKuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.
Luigi AngrisaniUniversity of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Faruq Mohamed BadiuddinValiant Clinic, Dubayy, United Arab Emirates.
Jose María BalibreaHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ahmad BashirGBMC at Jordan Hospital, Amman, Jordan.
Estuardo BehrensNew Life Center, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Kiron BhatiaAustin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Laurent BierthoQuebec Heart and Lung Institute-Laval University, Quebec, Canada.
L Ulas BiterFranciscus Gasthuis Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jerome DargentPolyclinique Lyon Nord, Rillieux-la-Pape, France.
Maurizio De LucaCastelfranco Montebelluna Hospitals, Montebelluna, Italy.
Eric DeMariaEast Carolina University, Greenville, USA.
Mohamed Hayssam ElfawalMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Martin FriedOB Klinika-Center for Treatment of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders, Prague, Czech Republic.
Khaled A GawdatAin Shams School of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt.
Yitka GrahamBariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Miguel F HerreraInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico, Mexico.
Jacques M HimpensCHIREC Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Farah A HussainOregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA.
Kazunori KasamaYotsuya Medical Cube, Tokyo, Japan.
David KerriganPhoenix Health, London, UK.
Lilian KowFlinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jon KristinssonOslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Marina KurianNew York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
Ronald LiemDutch Obesity Clinic (NOK), The Hague, Netherlands.
Rami Edward LutfiUniversity of Illinois, Chicago, USA.
Vinod MenonUniversity Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Karl MillerDiakonissen & Wehrle Private Hospital, Salzburg, Austria.
Patrick NoelBouchard Private Hospital, Elsan, Marseille, France.
Oral OspanovKF "University Medical Center", Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan.
Mahir M OzmenIstinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ralph PeterliUniversity Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jaime PonceCHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA.
Gerhard PragerMedical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Arun PrasadApollo Hospitals, New Delhi, India.
P Praveen RajGem Hospital, Chennai, India.
Nelson R RodriguezCentro Médico Puerta de Hierro Andares, Zapopan, Mexico.
Raul RosenthalCleveland Clinic, Weston, FL, USA.
Nasser SakranEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
Jorge Nunes SantosJorge Manuel Nunes dos Santos, Lisbon, Portugal.
Asim ShabbirNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Scott A ShikoraBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Peter K SmallBariatric Unit, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, Sunderland, UK.
Craig J TaylorConcord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Cunchuan WangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Rudolf Alfred WeinerDepartment for Metabolic Surgery, Sana Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach, Germany.
Mariusz WylezolMedical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Wah YangThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Ali AminianCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide. Yet there is significant variation in practice concerning its various aspects. This paper report results from the first modified Delphi consensus-building exercise on SG.

methodsWe established a committee of 54 globally recognized opinion makers in this field. The committee agreed to vote on several statements concerning SG. An agreement or disagreement amongst ≥ 70.0% experts was construed as a consensus.

resultsThe committee achieved a consensus of agreement (n = 71) or disagreement (n = 7) for 78 out of 97 proposed statements after two rounds of voting. The committee agreed with 96.3% consensus that the characterization of SG as a purely restrictive procedure was inaccurate and there was 88.7% consensus that SG was not a suitable standalone, primary, surgical weight loss option for patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) without dysplasia. There was an overwhelming consensus of 92.5% that the sleeve should be fashioned over an orogastric tube of 36-40 Fr and a 90.7% consensus that surgeons should stay at least 1 cm away from the angle of His. Remarkably, the committee agreed with 81.1% consensus that SG patients should undergo a screening endoscopy every 5 years after surgery to screen for BE.

conclusionA multinational team of experts achieved consensus on several aspects of SG. The findings of this exercise should help improve the outcomes of SG, the commonest bariatric procedure worldwide, and guide future research on this topic.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidDelphi TechniqueGastrectomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeWeight LossBariatric surgeryGastric sleeveObesity surgerySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.