ArticleClinical oral investigations2021
Influence of different carrier materials on biphasic calcium phosphate induced bone regeneration.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Histomorphometric Assessment of Non-Decalcified Plastic-Embedded Specimens for Evaluation of Bone Regeneration Using Bone Substitute Materials-A Systematic Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Effect of Scaffold Geometrical Structure on Macrophage Polarization during Bone Regeneration Using Honeycomb Tricalcium Phosphate.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Influence of Xenogeneic and Alloplastic Carriers for Bone Augmentation on Human Unrestricted Somatic Stem Cells.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Tissue Engineering in Stomatology: A Review of Potential Approaches for Oral Disease Treatments.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBiphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) is a bioceramic material successfully used in alloplastic bone augmentation. Despite many advantages, a disadvantage of BCP seems to be a difficult application and position instability. The aim of this study was to determine how different carrier materials influence BCP-induced quantitative and qualitative bone regeneration. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 70 critical size defects were set in the frontal bone of 14 domestic pigs (5 each) and filled randomly with either BCP alone (BCP), BCP in combination with nano-hydroxyapatite (BCP + NHA), BCP embedded in native porcine type I/III collagen blocks (BCP + C), autologous bone (AB), or were left empty (ED). Specimens were harvested after 4 and 8 weeks and were evaluated histologically as well as histomorphometrically.
resultsSignificantly lowest rate of new bone formation was found in ED (p = < 0.001) and BCP + NHA groups (p = 0.05). After 8 weeks, the highest percentage of new bone formation was observed in the BCP + C group. Fibrous matrix was detected highest in BCP alone. The lowest residual bone substitute material was found in BCP + C after 8 weeks.
conclusionsBCP-induced bone regeneration is indeed affected by different carrier types. Surface morphology and bioactive characteristics influence osseointegration and new bone formation in vivo. The combination of type I/III collagen seems most suitable for qualitative and quantitative bone regeneration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Stabilization of granular bone substitutes using type I/III collagen might be an alternative to granulates alone, indicating excellent volume stability, satisfactory plasticity, and easy application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.