Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433595›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

Elliott Mark Weiss, Aleksandra E Olszewski, Katherine F Guttmann, Brooke E Magnus, Sijia Li, Anita R Shah, Sandra E Juul, Yvonne W Wu, Kaashif A Ahmad, Ellen Bendel-Stenzel and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Determinants of Infant Participation and Non-Participation in Primary Prevention Trials.Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme · 2026
    Article
  11. A quality improvement project to optimize the neonatology research experience for families.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  12. Diversity, equity, and inclusion considerations for anti-racist, equity-focused NICU family mental health.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exception From Informed Consent Community Consultation Surveys-Do Respondent Characteristics Accurately Reflect Targeted Communities?Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Elliott Mark WeissTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Aleksandra E OlszewskiTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Katherine F GuttmannDepartment of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Brooke E MagnusDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Sijia LiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle.
Anita R ShahDivision of Neonatology, Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, California.
Sandra E JuulDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Yvonne W WuDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco.
Kaashif A AhmadDepartment of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas.
Ellen Bendel-StenzelDepartment of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Natalia A IsazaDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Andrea L LamplandDepartment of Neonatology, Children's Minnesota Hospital, Minneapolis.
Amit M MathurDepartment of Pediatrics, St Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Rakesh RaoDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
David RileyDepartment of Pediatrics, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
David G RussellDivision of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Zeynep N I SalihDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis.
Carrie B TorrDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.
Joern-Hendrik WeitkampDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Uchenna E AnaniDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Taeun ChangDepartment of Neurology, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Juanita DudleyDivision of Neonatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
John FlibotteDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Erin M HavrillaDepartment of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Charmaine M KathenPediatrix Medical Group, San Antonio, Texas.
Alexandra C O'KaneDepartment of Neurology, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
Krystle PerezDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle.
Brenda J StanleyPediatrix Medical Group, San Antonio, Texas.
Benjamin S WilfondTreuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington.
Seema K ShahDepartment of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
University of Washington · USGeorge Washington University · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USBoston College · USChildren's Hospital of Orange County · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USCook Children's Medical Center · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USIndiana University School of MedicineMayo Clinic · USNorthwestern University · USSaint Louis University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Minnesota Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Utah · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It remains poorly understood how parents decide whether to enroll a child in a neonatal clinical trial. This is particularly true for parents from racial or ethnic minority populations. Understanding factors associated with enrollment decisions may improve recruitment processes for families, increase enrollment rates, and decrease disparities in research participation. Objective: To assess differences in parental factors between parents who enrolled their infant and those who declined enrollment for a neonatal randomized clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study conducted from July 2017 to October 2019 in 12 US level 3 and 4 neonatal intensive care units included parents of infants who enrolled in the High-dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) trial or who were eligible but declined enrollment. Data were analyzed October 2019 through July 2020. Exposure: Parental choice of enrollment in neonatal clinical trial. Main Outcomes and Measures: Percentages and odds ratios (ORs) of parent participation as categorized by demographic characteristics, self-assessment of child's medical condition, study comprehension, and trust in medical researchers. Survey questions were based on the hypothesis that parents who enrolled their infant in HEAL differ from those who declined enrollment across 4 categories: (1) infant characteristics and parental demographic characteristics, (2) perception of infant's illness, (3) study comprehension, and (4) trust in clinicians and researchers. Results: Of a total 387 eligible parents, 269 (69.5%) completed the survey and were included in analysis. This included 183 of 242 (75.6%) of HEAL-enrolled and 86 of 145 (59.3%) of HEAL-declined parents. Parents who enrolled their infant had lower rates of Medicaid participation (74 [41.1%] vs 47 [55.3%]; P = .04) and higher rates of annual income greater than $55 000 (94 [52.8%] vs 30 [37.5%]; P = .03) compared with those who declined. Black parents had lower enrollment rates compared with White parents (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.17-0.73). Parents who reported their infant's medical condition as more serious had higher enrollment rates (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.0-16.3). Parents who enrolled their infant reported higher trust in medical researchers compared with parents who declined (mean [SD] difference, 5.3 [0.3-10.3]). There was no association between study comprehension and enrollment. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the following factors were associated with neonatal clinical trial enrollment: demographic characteristics (ie, race/ethnicity, Medicaid status, and reported income), perception of illness, and trust in medical researchers. Future work to confirm these findings and explore the reasons behind them may lead to strategies for better engaging underrepresented groups in neonatal clinical research to reduce enrollment disparities.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleParental ConsentParentsRefusal to ParticipateSurveys and QuestionnairesTrust

Identifiers

PMID33433595
PMCPMC7804922
OpenAlexW3118580608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.