Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433559›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy Pragmatic Physical Activity Intervention Trial for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Design and Baseline Characteristics.

Marcia L Stefanick, Abby C King, Sally Mackey, Lesley F Tinker, Mark A Hlatky, Michael J LaMonte, John Bellettiere, Joseph C Larson, Garnet Anderson, Charles L Kooperberg and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02425345 (Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02425345 nacompletednot on this map

Women's Health Initiative Strong and Healthy Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2015 to 2024Enrolled49,331ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, Stroke, Cardiovascular Mortality, Hip FracturesArmsPhysical Activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Understanding Historical Trauma Among Urban Indigenous Adults at Risk for Diabetes.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Marcia L StefanickDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Abby C KingDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Sally MackeyDepartment of Medicine, Stanford Prevention Research Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Lesley F TinkerPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Mark A HlatkyDepartment of Medicine, Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.
Michael J LaMonteDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo-SUNY, New York, USA.
John BellettiereDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
Joseph C LarsonPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Garnet AndersonPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Charles L KooperbergPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Andrea Z LaCroixPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

University of Buffalo Clinical and Translational Science Institute - Supplement SchulyerUL1TR001412 · NCATS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI MURPHY, TIMOTHY F · 2015 to 2024
$33.8M
Women's Health Initiative Strong & Healthy (WHISH) NIA Exercise MaterialsU01HL122280 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEFANICK, MARCIA L. · 2015 to 2019
$6.9M
Physical Activity to Improve CV Health in Older Women: A Pragmatic TrialR33HL151885 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2021 to 2023
$6.4M
Physical Activity to Improve CV Health in Older Women: A Pragmatic Trial -- DCCU01HL122273 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI KOOPERBERG, CHARLES L, LACROIX, ANDREA Z. · 2015 to 2019
$4.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001412NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600002CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600003CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600004CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201600018CNHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL151885NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL122273NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL122280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines promote physical activity to prevent cardiovascular disease (CVD), yet no randomized controlled trial has tested whether physical activity reduces CVD.

methodsThe Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Strong and Healthy (WHISH) pragmatic trial used a randomized consent design to assign women for whom cardiovascular outcomes were available through WHI data collection (N = 18 985) or linkage to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (N30 346), to a physical activity intervention or "usual activity" comparison, stratified by ages 68-99 years (in tertiles), U.S. geographic region, and outcomes data source. Women assigned to the intervention could "opt out" after receiving initial physical activity materials. Intervention materials applied evidence-based behavioral science principles to promote current national recommendations for older Americans. The intervention was adapted to participant input regarding preferences, resources, barriers, and motivational drivers and was targeted for 3 categories of women at lower, middle, or higher levels of self-reported physical functioning and physical activity. Physical activity was assessed in both arms through annual questionnaires. The primary outcome is major cardiovascular events, specifically myocardial infarction, stroke, or CVD death; primary safety outcomes are hip fracture and non-CVD death. The trial is monitored annually by an independent Data Safety and Monitoring Board. Final analyses will be based on intention to treat in all randomized participants, regardless of intervention engagement.

resultsThe 49 331 randomized participants had a mean baseline age of 79.7 years; 84.3% were White, 9.2% Black, 3.3% Hispanic, 1.9% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.3% Native American, and 1% were of unknown race/ethnicity. The mean baseline RAND-36 physical function score was 71.6 (± 25.2 SD). There were no differences between Intervention (N = 24 657) and Control (N = 24 674) at baseline for age, race/ethnicity, current smoking (2.5%), use of blood pressure or lipid-lowering medications, body mass index, physical function, physical activity, or prior CVD (10.1%).

conclusionThe WHISH trial is rigorously testing whether a physical activity intervention reduces major CV events in a large, diverse cohort of older women. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02425345.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overExerciseExercise TherapyFemaleHumansMedicareMyocardial InfarctionOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePhysical FitnessPhysical Functional PerformancePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPreventive Health ServicesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStrokeCardiovascularFallsPhysical activityPhysical function

Identifiers

PMID33433559
PMCPMC8011700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.