Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33433497›Full record

ArticleNeural regeneration research2021

Safety and efficacy of a nerve matrix membrane as a collagen nerve wrapping: a randomized, single-blind, multicenter clinical trial.

Yong-Bin Gao, Zhi-Gang Liu, Guo-Dong Lin, Yang Guo, Lei Chen, Bo-Tao Huang, Yao-Bin Yin, Chen Yang, Li-Ying Sun, Yan-Bo Rong and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neural regeneration research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Management of accidental tooth root displacement into the mandibular canal during tooth extraction].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yong-Bin GaoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Gang LiuDepartment of Hand Surgery, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Guo-Dong LinDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
Yang GuoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lei ChenDepartment of Hand Surgery, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China.
Bo-Tao HuangDepartment of Hand and Foot Surgery, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai, Shandong Province, China.
Yao-Bin YinDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chen YangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li-Ying SunDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yan-Bo RongDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shanlin ChenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Weatherford College · USBeijing Jishuitan Hospital · CNFirst Bethune Hospital of Jilin University · CNPeking University · CNYuhuangding Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new nerve matrix membrane derived from decellularized porcine nerves has been shown to retain the major extracellular matrix components, and to be effective in preventing adhesion between the nerve anastomosis sites and the surrounding tissues in a rat sciatic nerve transection model, thereby enhancing regeneration of the nerve. The effectiveness of the membrane may be attributed to its various bioactive components. In this prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled multicenter clinical trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of the new nerve matrix membrane with a previously approved bovine tendon-derived type I collagen nerve wrapping. A total of 120 patients with peripheral nerve injury were recruited from Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, and Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China. The patients were randomly assigned to undergo end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy with nerve matrix membrane (n = 60, 52 male, 8 female, mean age 41.34 years, experimental group) or tendon-derived collagen nerve wrapping (n = 60, 42 male, 18 female, mean age 40.17 years, control group). Patients were followed-up at 14 ± 5, 30 ± 7, 90 ± 10 and 180 ± 20 days after the operation. Safety evaluation included analyses of local and systemic reactions, related laboratory tests, and adverse reactions. Efficacy evaluation included a static 2-point discrimination test, a moving 2-point discrimination test, and a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination. Sensory nerve function was evaluated with the British Medical Research Council Scale and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination. The ratio (percentage) of patients with excellent to good results in sensory nerve recovery 180 ± 20 days after the treatment was used as the primary effectiveness index. The percentages of patients with excellent to good results in the experimental and control groups were 98.00% and 94.44%, respectively, with no significant difference between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the results of routine blood tests, liver and renal function tests, coagulation function tests, or immunoglobulin tests at 14 and 180 days postoperatively between the two groups. These findings suggest that the novel nerve matrix membrane is similar in efficacy to the commercially-available bovine-derived collagen membrane in the repair of peripheral nerve injury, and it may therefore serve as an alternative in the clinical setting. The clinical trial was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, China (approval No. 20160902) on October 8, 2016, the Institutional Ethics Committee of the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, China (approval No. 160518-088) on December 14, 2016, and the Institutional Ethics Committee of Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, China (approval No. 2016-10-01) on December 9, 2016. The clinical trial was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2000033324) on May 28, 2020.

Indexed as

clinical trialextracellular matrixnerve conduitnerve matrixnerve repairneural regenerationneurorrhaphyperipheral nerve injurysensory nerve recovery

Identifiers

PMID33433497
PMCPMC8323693
OpenAlexW3120734200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.