ArticleBiochemistry2021
Exploring the Evolutionary History of Kinetic Stability in the α-Lytic Protease Family.
Article in Biochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying protein unfolding kinetics with a high-throughput microfluidic platform.Cell systems · 2026Article
- Exploring the sequence and structural determinants of the energy landscape from thermodynamically stable and kinetically trapped subtilisins: ISP1 and SbtE.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Lysine carbamoylation during urea denaturation remodels the energy landscape of human transthyretin dissociation linked to unfolding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025Article
- Ancestral Reconstruction and the Evolution of Protein Energy Landscapes.Annual review of biophysics · 2024Review
- Allelic variations in the chpG effector gene within Clavibacter michiganensis populations determine pathogen host range.PLoS pathogens · 2024Article
- The conformational landscape of a serpin N-terminal subdomain facilitates folding and in-cell quality control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In addition to encoding the tertiary fold and stability, the primary sequence of a protein encodes the folding trajectory and kinetic barriers that determine the speed of folding. How these kinetic barriers are encoded is not well understood. Here, we use evolutionary sequence variation in the α-lytic protease (αLP) protein family to probe the relationship between sequence and energy landscape. αLP has an unusual energy landscape: the native state of αLP is not the most thermodynamically favored conformation and, instead, remains folded due to a large kinetic barrier preventing unfolding. To fold, αLP utilizes an N-terminal pro region similar in size to the protease itself that functions as a folding catalyst. Once folded, the pro region is removed, and the native state does not unfold on a biologically relevant time scale. Without the pro region, αLP folds on the order of millennia. A phylogenetic search uncovers αLP homologs with a wide range of pro region sizes, including some with no pro region at all. In the resulting phylogenetic tree, these homologs cluster by pro region size. By studying homologs naturally lacking a pro region, we demonstrate they can be thermodynamically stable, fold much faster than αLP, yet retain the same fold as αLP. Key amino acids thought to contribute to αLP's extreme kinetic stability are lost in these homologs, supporting their role in kinetic stability. This study highlights how the entire energy landscape plays an important role in determining the evolutionary pressures on the protein sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.